Laserfiche WebLink
conceivable that this prohibition would not be extended beyond 2030, it is hardly the most <br />pressing issue for Pleasanton as a governmental constraints. <br />#3 is routine revisions of the state density bonus laws and other statutes that are required as a <br />matter of course. Even if Pleasanton did not update its local codes to account for them, the <br />state laws would still preempt them. <br />My underlying point is that this analysis of govenuuental constraints is not a substantive <br />one. <br />I would ask Lisa Wise Consultants to look at the following items as governmental <br />constraints: 1) parking requirements in excess of HCD's guidance; 2) multifamily and high <br />density zoning regulations that do not meet Mullin Density miuiintuu densities or LIHTC <br />financing sizes of 50-70 units; 3) 30 foot height limits for residential and mixed-use <br />development near job clusters and the city's two BART stations. <br />Thank you <br />Derek Sagehorn <br />Click h= to report this email as spam. <br />Derek Sagehom <br />