My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 11022021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 11022021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2022 3:09:00 PM
Creation date
2/2/2022 3:08:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/2/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
which is typically one of the more challenging categories if the decision is made to participate in the <br /> State's conversion programs. <br /> Director Clark reported Senate Bill (SB) 8 by Senator Nancy Skinner makes changes to SB 330, the <br /> Housing Crisis Act of 2019, which provides streamlining and limits discretionary review of housing <br /> projects. It provides a clarifying definition of "housing development project" to include projects that <br /> involve no discretionary approvals, projects that include both discretionary and non-discretionary <br /> approvals, and projects that include a proposal to construct a single dwelling unit. She advised it <br /> changed the sunset date of SB 330 from January 2, 2025, to January 1, 2030. The City has yet to <br /> receive an SB 330 application although they are being seen in increasing numbers in other cities as <br /> developers seek to take advantage of the streamlining provisions. <br /> Director Clark reported Senate Bill (SB) 9 by Senator Toni Atkins affects single-family zoning in cities. It <br /> allows two-unit housing developments and urban lot splits "by right' in single-family neighborhoods. It <br /> also allows for an existing parcel to split into no more than 2 lots resulting in a lot of at least 1,200 <br /> square feet and roughly proportional. She reported each lot may contain up to 2 units at least 800 <br /> square feet each and can include an Accessory dwelling Unit (ADU) or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit <br /> (JADU). She further advised on lots that are not subject to a lot split, up to 2 units and an ADU or JADU <br /> for each primary unit is permitted. <br /> Another aspect of SB 9 is that housing developments and lot splits must be approved ministerially. <br /> There is some limited authority for the City's building official to make written findings to deny a project <br /> based on evidence that the development would have an adverse effect on public health and safety, or <br /> the environment could not be mitigated through reasonable measures. Eligible parcels must be located <br /> in a single-family zone within an urbanized area, not be located within environmentally sensitive areas, <br /> not include tenant-occupied housing, and not be on a designated historic site. She explained there are <br /> limits for properties located in high fire hazard or seismic risk areas, but projects can be allowed if the <br /> risks can be mitigated. <br /> SB 9 requires the City to allow for a minimum 4-foot side and rear yard setback in conjunction with SB 9 <br /> housing development and lot splits but noted other local zoning setbacks can be applied. Parking <br /> requirements are limited to one per unit and noted no parking is required for a site located within 0.5 <br /> miles of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor. <br /> Director Clark advised SB 9 establishes minimum setbacks and some basic development standards but <br /> does allow the City to establish its own objective development design and subdivision standards, but <br /> must be consistent with the bill. The City can still require good design, high-quality materials, and <br /> control things such as the bulk and massing of buildings. She explained the law does not preclude <br /> Homeowner Associations (HOAs) from limiting SB 9 projects through Covenants, Conditions, and <br /> Restrictions (CC&Rs). She advised the HOA is responsible for enforcement of any restrictions more <br /> stringent than City standards. <br /> SB 9 removes much of the design review and discretion normally allowed residential subdivisions and <br /> developments. However, the City can establish objective standards provided that do not conflict with <br /> state law. She reported staff has been working on a draft ordinance that was considered by the <br /> Planning Commission on October 27 and will be forwarded to the City Council at the November 19 <br /> meeting since SB 9 goes into effect on January 1, 2022. <br /> SB 10 by Senator Scott Weiner is a voluntary ordinance meaning the City could choose to adopt an <br /> ordinance like this, but it is not mandated. She advised it provides the City authority to adopt an <br /> ordinance to zone any parcel for up to 10 units of residential density per parcel, at a height specified in <br /> the ordinance, if the parcel is located in a transit-rich area or an urban infill site. One of the provisions <br /> included in the bill prohibits a local ordinance from superseding a local regulation for open space <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 19 November 2,2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.