Laserfiche WebLink
fit so the staff decided "encourage" was a better approach but can go back to "required" should the City <br /> Council recommend the change. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Associate Planner Campbell advised staff first looked at state <br /> legislation that calls for carbon neutrality by 2045 and noted moving it up would be quite aggressive. <br /> She believes there need to be changes in technology in addition to state and federal legislation to help <br /> the City get there. She noted that moving up the already aggressive carbon neutrality goal by 2045 <br /> would be a challenge if not impossible. <br /> Councilmember Arkin expressed support for GHG impact fees and noted she would be interested in <br /> exploring it and being more aggressive with requiring versus encouraging incentives. She expressed <br /> support for the CAP 2.0 plan. <br /> Councilmember Narum believes that 1163 at a minimum should require that new construction be built <br /> with wired plug-in solar to accommodate batteries. She believes the plan should require plug-ins for <br /> electric vehicles (EVs). She advised it is $4,000 to $5,000 to wire an existing home for a plug-in vehicle <br /> and believes it would be easier and less expensive to include it as part of new construction. She noted <br /> she does not see the word solar or battery in 1164 and believes that those should be considerations. <br /> She expressed support for the Urban Forest Master Plan, increasing the carbon sequestration through <br /> trees. She reported there have been conversations at Livermore Amador Transportation Authority <br /> (LAVTA) about the use of hydrogen for powering busses and noted Valley Link is discussing the same <br /> and wondered if there should at least be a reference to hydrogen. She reported LAVTA is moving to <br /> zero emission-based busses and believes it should be in the report. She agreed with the Bicycle and <br /> Trails Master Plan. <br /> Councilmember Narum believes there needs to be a program to move residents to more water-efficient <br /> appliances and toilets and inquired if that should be a primary action since the City Council has asked <br /> to have it. She noted there is a used car market for EV vehicles and inquired about charging stations for <br /> the economically disadvantaged and would like to see it mentioned in the plan. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, City Attorney Sodergren reported there has been recently <br /> adopted state law that prohibits the sale of gas-powered equipment, but it does not take effect until <br /> 2024. Associate Planner Campbell confirmed the ban of gas-powered equipment could be counted <br /> towards the GHG reduction. She advised it is listed in the off-road transportation in the inventory and <br /> includes all sorts of small engine off-road equipment including construction equipment and lawn <br /> equipment. She confirmed a transition to gas-powered leaf blowers would ultimately have some impact <br /> on the inventory. <br /> Councilmember Narum expressed support to the jobs-housing balance as a way to address the <br /> transportation issue. She noted she does not support hiring a Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) at this time <br /> and would like to leave that decision to the new City Manager. She believes this is a thorough plan and <br /> appreciates the inclusion of a Cost Benefit Analysis. She applauded whoever designed the outreach to <br /> residents and noted the feedback is reflective of the outreach to the community. She noted the efforts <br /> of EBCE and StopWaste on working with the City on this plan. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Associate Planner Campbell advised staff has woven in the <br /> municipal aspects of the City leading by example through all of the actions in the document. <br /> Councilmember Testa recalled a report a few years about what City buildings use the most power. <br /> Management Analyst Zack Reda advised the City has explored the possibility of doing some energy <br /> efficiency upgrades rather than the solar on City facilities and then once the buildings were more <br /> efficient to think about using solar to kind of capture the last emissions there. He explained the project <br /> was put on hold until the CAP was completed and was going to be considered a CAP action because it <br /> does have a high upfront cost, but it usually will pay for itself over the long term. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 16 of 19 November 2,2021 <br />