Laserfiche WebLink
Address <br />City <br />: Pleasanton <br />State <br />:CA <br />Zipcode <br />: 94588 <br />Phone <br />Email <br />Select Recipient <br />: Mayor and City Council <br />Comments & Questions <br />: Mayor Brown, As I know you're aware, redistricting is ongoing throughout California. I've read your input <br />about keeping the entire Tri -Valley together as far as State Assembly and Senate Districts and I wholeheartedly <br />agree. If you believe in that same cohesiveness for the Alameda County Board of Supervisors redistricting <br />effort they need to hear from you, as well as Dublin Mayor Melissa Hernandez and Livermore Mayor Bob <br />Woernerin. Despite overwhelming public commentary on keeping the Alameda County Tri -Valley community <br />of interest (COI) together in one Supervisory District, the Board decided, with the exception of moving Sunol <br />into District 1, it would be best to leave the districts as they were divided in 2011 with only minor tweaking. <br />Draft Map A, which has Pleasanton split from the Tri -Valley, remaining in District 4 with Castro Valley, was <br />the only map approved by motion/seconding for public review out of the November 19th meeting. As of the last <br />meeting on November 23rd, Supervisor Miley pushed to have another draft map that included Pleasanton <br />(incorporated and unincorporated) in District 1 with Dublin, Livermore and Sunol. Although that was finally <br />motioned and seconded, Supervisor Haubert picked up on a suggestion from newly appointed Supervisor <br />Brown from the meeting on the 19th that Pleasanton would be better *split* between Districts 1 and 4. So <br />another motion was seconded to move the southeast portion of Pleasanton (some incorporated, mostly <br />unincorporated) into District 1. There seems to be a misunderstanding on the unincorporated agriculture and <br />open space being included in Pleasanton's planning; the Board's doesn't believe it is. There is a majority <br />resistance on the Board to moving away from our current configuration. Some of it is because the Supervisors <br />see value inat least two representatives for larger population areas, giving those areas more votes on board <br />issues. Of course, that assumes both/all reps agree on the issue. Supervisor Valle has a different view. In both <br />meetings, he brought up what he's calling a "poverty COI", and the inequity of services within Alameda County <br />depending on where one lives. Using COVID vaccinations as an example, Supervisor Valle spoke on the 19th <br />