My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENT 1-2
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
020122
>
10 ATTACHMENT 1-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2022 3:43:31 PM
Creation date
1/26/2022 3:41:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
10
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\020122
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"elevated" in preference due to unique considerations include sites like Stoneridge Mall, whose <br />size, location, and strong developer interest make it a promising location for new high density <br />housing. Stoneridge Mall was the most commonly -identified location in the Housing Element <br />community survey. <br />The 50 -acre Kiewitt property (in East Pleasanton), is a large, 50 -acre site that could offer an <br />opportunity for a master -planned community, and per the applicant would include a sizable <br />increment of affordable housing, along with market -rate units. And, although being a mid -ranked <br />site based on the initial review criteria, the Old Santa Rita Road area is ripe for redevelopment <br />and new investment, comprising many significantly underutilized parcels and low -intensity uses, <br />and properties that have seen extremely limited investment in recent years, and could be <br />developed more intensively without substantially impacting neighbors. <br />Both the Merritt project and Lester project have had consideration through the City Council work <br />plan prioritization process, with direction from the City Council to place these as a "B" priority <br />and for consideration in the Housing Element process. In the case of the Lester project, an <br />active application has been in process with the City for more than three years. The Merritt <br />property has been long -considered as a potential site for housing, has a General Plan land use <br />designation for residential development, and would be a logical location for annexation and infill <br />along the east side of Foothill Road. The applicant has committed to including affordable <br />housing units within the project, and as a senior housing project, it would have limited impact on <br />schools and traffic. <br />Conversely, some sites that performed relatively well in the initial ranking, may be less <br />worthwhile to consider due to their specific location or site characteristics; some of these sites <br />are discussed in more detail below. <br />After reviewing the initial sites and taking the initial ranking and other considerations in mind, <br />staff is recommending the majority of sites listed be carried forward into the CEQA analysis, with <br />the following three sites are suggested to be removed from the initial list: <br />• Site #12: Pimlico Drive (South) — 40 Units: This site is developed with a popular local <br />grocery, and abuts single-family residential uses immediately to the south, making it less <br />suitable for higher -density development. As such, and with a relatively small yield of units, <br />this site appears less suitable than the properties to the north of Pimlico Drive for <br />residential development. <br />• Site #20: Boulder Court — 284 Units: These sites are relatively large and, due to their <br />location, unlikely to create impacts to neighboring residences if developed with high <br />density housing. However, a high-density housing project would be relatively isolated <br />from any convenient shopping or services, given that the broader area is almost entirely <br />dedicated to light industrial and service commercial uses. <br />Site #26: St. Augustine —19 Units: This site is entirely surrounded by low-density, low- <br />rise residential development, and would thus be suitable only for relatively low-density <br />housing. Given that it is a small site, with no expressed owner interest, staff does not <br />recommend its inclusion. <br />Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br />15 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.