My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENT 8
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
020122
>
10 ATTACHMENT 8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2022 3:44:08 PM
Creation date
1/26/2022 3:40:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
10
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\020122
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Jennifer Hagen <br />From:Ellen Holmgren <br />Sent:Tuesday, January 18, 2022 10:59 AM <br />To:Matt Sullivan; Mayor and City Council <br />Cc:Pleasanton City Clerk; Ellen Clark; Sachiko Riddle; Becky Hopkins; Jennifer Hagen; Shweta Bonn; Dan <br />Sodergren <br />Subject:RE: Jan 18th Meeting <br />Dear Matt Sullivan, <br /> <br />Thank you for your email regarding Item No. 10, Item 11 and Item 12 on the City Council Agenda for tonight, <br />Tuesday, January 18, 2022. <br /> <br />This email acknowledges receipt of your email to the Mayor and City Council, the City Manager, and City staff. <br /> <br />Thank you again for your interest in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Regards, <br /> <br />Ellen Holmgren, Administrative Assistant <br />City of Pleasanton <br /> <br /> <br />From: Matt Sullivan <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 10:46 AM <br />To: Mayor and City Council <citycouncil@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br />Subject: Jan 18th Meeting <br /> <br />Dear Mayor and Council, <br /> <br />I wanted to provide this input for your January 18th meeting. <br /> <br />District Elections <br /> <br />I strongly encourage you to establish districts that keep neighborhoods intact, and keep adjacent neighborhoods <br />together where they face common issues. For example, the neighborhoods that straddle I‐680 south of Stoneridge Dr. <br />and north of Bernal Ave. face many of the same traffic, public health (noise and air pollution from the freeway), and <br />economic class issues and should be combined. Similarly, the existing and likely future high‐density development north <br />of Stoneridge has similar characteristics. Pleasanton south of Bernal is more affluent and rural in nature which makes <br />sense as a distinct district. Downtown and the Vintage Hills eastern area seems like a logical district. I don’t know how <br />this stacks up from a population standpoint but I would suggest districts along a north‐south‐east‐west division makes <br />sense. While I have some concerns that districting will lead to “provincial” fighting on the City Council, I also think it <br />might strengthen neighborhood representation where now neighborhood concerns are marginalized in favor of special <br />interests (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, developers, and favored sports groups). <br /> <br />Ballot Measure 21‐016 <br /> <br />I strongly support a ballot measure that will return local control over land use to municipalities. If further refinement to <br />the ballot language is needed as suggested by staff, I’m ok with that too. But in contrary to staff recommendation, I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.