My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENT 8
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
020122
>
10 ATTACHMENT 8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2022 3:44:08 PM
Creation date
1/26/2022 3:40:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
10
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\020122
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
101 California Street, Suite 800, San Francisco CA 94111 | PH 650-571-2200 | WEB SteelWaveLLC.com <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />November 16, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Ellen Clark <br />Director of Community Development <br />City of Pleasanton <br />123 Main Street <br />Pleasanton, Ca 94566 <br /> <br />RE: P21-0751, 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br /> <br />Dear Ellen, <br /> <br />SteelWave submits this letter to reiterate its desire for the USL Pleasanton Lakes L.P. parcels (the USL <br />Parcels) to be included in the City of Pleasanton’s (City) 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (HE Update). <br />To prepare the City’s preliminary list of housing development sites for inclusion in the HE Update, City <br />Planning Staff conducted extensive outreach efforts with property owners in the area, asking owners <br />to submit a Statement of Interest requesting inclusion of their sites in the HE Update. As you are <br />aware, Planning Staff did not include SteelWave in those outreach efforts. After we discovered <br />SteelWave’s exclusion from the HE Update site selection process, we immediately submitted a <br />Statement of Interest. However, because we did not learn of the City’s site selection process until <br />several weeks after the City’s deadline for Statement of Interest submission, our late submission did <br />not allow City Planning Staff adequate time to evaluate the submittal in necessary detail. For that <br />reason, and recognizing the Planning Commission’s interest in the USL Parcels, I have prepared this <br />letter to assist Staff’s further consideration of the USL Parcels for inclusion in the HE Update. <br /> <br />Below, we comment on City Planning Staff’s scoring of the USL Parcels under several of the City’s site <br />selection criteria and highlight several benefits of developing the USL Parcels for residential uses. We <br />maintain our commitment to the City of Pleasanton and continue to believe our site is an ideal location <br />to provide residential housing for both the current and future residents of Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Scoring of the USL Parcels under the City’s Approved Site Selection Criteria <br /> <br />1a) Sites intended to accommodate housing at density of 30 DUA or more. The site, or portion of the <br />site to be rezoned, is larger than 0.5 acres in size, and less than 10 acres in size. USL proposes an 8 <br />acre of site within the City of Pleasanton to be rezoned to 30 DUA. <br /> Recommended Score: 1 <br /> <br />1c) The site is an infill site. Now that the former use has been closed, the USL Parcels proposed for <br />development consist largely of flat, unimproved and underutilized land with no significant biological <br />resources. The USL Parcels as also located east of the Ponderosa Ironwood Estates and the City of <br />Pleasanton Operations Service Facility Center, and near the Pleasanton Garbage Facility, and development
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.