Laserfiche WebLink
Commission reviewed examples of high quality projects from other Bay Area jurisdictions <br />including Redwood City and Mountain View, concluding that these sorts of project <br />densities could be well-designed and "fit" well in certain parts of Pleasanton where <br />commercial buildings of similar height and scale exist today. These higher density <br />projects are also typically built with structured parking (either podium or "wrap" style), <br />allowing more opportunities for common open space and amenities, on areas of the site <br />that would otherwise be occupied by surface parking, as is more typical for projects in the <br />30 du/ac range. Higher density projects will also tend to produce a larger number of <br />smaller units that will tend to be more affordable "by design." <br />Based on this recommendation, staff increased the proposed density on three of the sites <br />to 45-75 du/ac: Site 2: Stoneridge Shopping Center, Site 9: Metro 580, and Site 29: <br />Oracle. Additional information including housing types and Pleasanton -specific examples <br />for various density ranges (other than the 45-75 du/ac range) can be found in the <br />November 10 Planning Commission agenda report included in Attachment 1. The <br />Housing Commission was also supportive of the proposed concept of increasing density <br />on certain sites, where appropriate. <br />Preliminary Sites List and Estimate of Site Capacity and Units at Various Income Levels <br />Staff's initial efforts to identify potential housing sites yielded a total of 29 properties or <br />areas to be considered for rezoning to allow residential development. The sites are <br />located city wide, and are of a range of sizes and types, including both vacant properties, <br />underutilized portions of existing developed sites (such as excess parking), as well as <br />sites that may require redevelopment of existing uses. <br />Table 3 in this report lists each site and summarizes additional information including site <br />size, and potential capacity in various affordability categories. As noted, each site has <br />been assigned a preliminary density range, based on various factors including site <br />location and context, size, and other considerations; potential capacity has been <br />estimated based on an average density for the range (for low and medium density sites), <br />and the low end of the range (for high density sites). The list is keyed to a map, included <br />in Attachment 3, generally organized geographically (i.e. the numbering does not reflect a <br />ranking). <br />Attachment 3, Preliminary Sites Inventory - Data Report, provides an expanded summary <br />and analysis of each site, including the lot or area size, existing uses, current zoning, <br />current general plan designation, and other key attributes, opportunities, constraints or <br />other factors that may weigh into its consideration. <br />Unlike the 4t" Cycle Housing Element cycle where only high-density sites were rezoned, <br />staff has identified sites for consideration at high-, medium-, and low- densities. This is in <br />part because of the range and diversity of sites brought forward by individual property <br />owners, not all of which are suitable for high-density housing. It also broadens the options <br />available to the City Council in identifying an inventory to meet not only the shortfall of <br />sites to accommodate its lower-income RHNA, but also the remaining moderate or above <br />Page 6 of 18