My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 10192021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 10192021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2022 10:54:47 AM
Creation date
1/19/2022 10:54:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In response to Councilmember Testa, Director Clark confirmed if the inclusionary housing requirement <br /> is too substantial, HCD sees it as an impediment to housing development due to the cost burden. She <br /> advised the City's IZO of 15% for rentals and 20% on for-sale properties is within the State's typical <br /> range. She noted the recommendation is pointed towards whether the 15% and 20% should be aligned. <br /> Councilmember Testa advised she would support increasing the percentage if permitted, and noted <br /> having both be 20% makes sense and seems like a simple change. She cited the concerns presented <br /> in the community survey about high taxes and urged new financing solutions to not include local bond <br /> measures. She encouraged pushing the State to issue more General Obligation (GO) Bonds which will <br /> not increase property taxes and fund the mandates being imposed on cities. <br /> Mayor Brown requested that census data used when possible for demographics. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Director Clark clarified the report includes a lot of interrelated data, <br /> extending to Alameda County and the Bay Area. She cautioned against orientating all data to the <br /> census because of how many data points would have to be changed in the report. The census data is <br /> just now coming out and may not be entirely known until next year. The data could be changed in some <br /> key places if the information is known, or presented alongside what is already in the report. <br /> Mayor Brown echoed support for faith-based organizations, noting some of the large landholdings by <br /> local churches and the success of Goodness Village. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Director Clark clarified-starting in 2023 CSCDA conversions can count <br /> towards RHNA allocations due to recently-signed state law. The City would still have to account for the <br /> lost market-rate units from the conversion so the quantities are simply redistributed. She acknowledged <br /> this does take care of numbers for a more challenging category. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Director Clark confirmed the CSCDA does allow for a local preference for <br /> specific populations in a community such as teachers or veterans. <br /> Mayor Brown expressed support for the policy suggestions. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL <br /> Councilmember Arkin requested support for a resolution in support of net energy metering. She advised <br /> the California Public Utility Commission is facing a proposal that would hinder the State's rooftop solar <br /> market. Councilmember Narum reported she will be attending an East Bay Community Energy (EBCE) <br /> meeting tomorrow and this has been a topic of discussion. She asked for time to gather more <br /> information and see if EBCE has a formal position on the subject. <br /> COUNCIL REPORTS <br /> Councilmember Balch reported attending an Alameda County Liaison meeting and StopWaste meeting. <br /> Councilmember Arkin reported attending the County Liaison meeting and Altamont Landfill Committee <br /> meeting. <br /> Councilmember Testa reported attending an Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District meeting. <br /> Councilmember Narum reported attending a ValleyLink meeting, Contra Costa Transportation <br /> Authority's Innovate 680 meeting on behalf of the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA), <br /> and County Liaison meeting. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 14 October 19,2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.