Laserfiche WebLink
Exclusion of these sites would reduce overall capacity by 343 units, leaving a remaining total <br />capacity of 4,503 units among the other 24 sites — this would bring the total capacity of new sites <br />needed slightly below the recommended 50 percent buffer (212 units less than the buffer). <br />PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION <br />The following section provides potential discussion topics and questions the Planning <br />Commission may wish to discuss. The discussion areas will allow the Planning Commission to <br />provide direction to the staff regarding any initial changes or clarifications to the initial sites, and <br />refinements or modifications to the draft inventory to be addressed before the list is brought back <br />in December for additional discussion and recommendation to the City Council. As noted, at the <br />December meeting, staff will also present the input received from the Housing Commission at <br />their November 18th meeting, and from the public at the community workshop planned for <br />December 1St <br />The topics focus both on the preliminary assumptions developed by staff for each site, as well as <br />the sites themselves. <br />A. Sites Caoacitv Buffer <br />Since the sites selection process will entail a progressive narrowing of the inventory list and <br />since the affordability assumptions for moderate and above -moderate units relatively flexible, it <br />is recommended that a broader inventory of sites be identified, with a total capacity of around 50 <br />percent more units than the identified gap (i.e. approximately 4,715 units). Staff believes that <br />providing a broader, rather than narrower, range of sites will provide City Council with flexibility <br />to adjust the list as the project moves through various stages of review. <br />Discussion Question: <br />1. Does the Planning Commission agree with staff's recommended 50 percent buffer (for the <br />initial sites inventory to be considered in the CEQA review? [If the Commission wished to <br />modify or reduce the initial buffer, staff would not recommend it be less than 30 percent.] <br />B. Densitv Ranges <br />As discussed previously, the sites inventory will reflect a range of densities for different sites. <br />Staff identified the following density ranges for each of the prospective sites in the inventory, and <br />allocated them to each site based factors like site size, location, and potential compatibility with <br />surrounding neighborhoods and uses: <br />• Low Density: Between 2 and 7 du/ac. <br />• Low/Medium Density: Between 8 and 14 du/ac <br />• Medium Density: Between 15 and 25 du/ac <br />• High Density: 30 du/ac and greater <br />High -Density Sites: Staff has identified three sites (Site # 2: Stoneridge Shopping Center; Site # <br />11: Old Santa Rita Area, and Site # 9: Metro 580), for consideration of density up to 60 du/ac <br />based on their proximity to transit and high employment areas as well their lack of directly <br />adjacent existing residential development. The other 11 high density sites would allow for <br />development up to 30 du/ac. <br />Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br />16 of 19 <br />