My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 0406
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
0401 - 0500
>
ORD 0406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2014 3:26:43 PM
Creation date
10/20/1999 10:57:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 0406
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 406 <br /> <br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF <br /> CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY, DESIGNATED <br /> AS ANNEXATION NO. 34, BERRY FARM, TO THE <br /> CITY OF PLEASANTON. <br /> <br /> The City Council does hereby ordain as follows: <br /> <br /> SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following <br />findings: (a) On February 25, 1965, the Council of the City <br />of Pleasanton did pass and adopt Resolution No. 65-23 giving <br />notice of the proposal to annex certain uninhabited territory <br />to the City of Pleasanton. Said territory was designated as <br />Annexation No. 34, Berry Farm, and did describe the boundaries <br />of the territory proposed to be annexed. <br /> <br /> (b) Said Resolution No. 65-23 contained a notice of <br /> <br />the time and place for the Council of the City of Pleasanton to <br />hear protests made by any person owning real property within the <br />territory proposed to be annexed. Said time of said hearing <br />was not less than fifteen nor more than sixty days from the <br />date of passage of the Resolution. <br /> <br /> (c) On April 5, 1965 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the <br />Council Chambers in the City Hall of the City of Pleasanton, <br />County of Alameda, State of California, the said City Council <br />did conduct a public hearing and pass upon protests made, there <br />being none. By Resolution No. 65-63 the City Council determined <br />that protests had not been made by the owners of one-half of <br />the value of the privately owned territory proposed to be annexed <br />as shown by the last equalized assessment roll, nor by public <br />owners of one-half of the value of the publicly owned territory <br />proposed to be annexed as determined by said legislative body° <br /> <br /> (d) Said territory is contiguous to the City of <br />Pleasanton, and is uninhabited territory in the County of <br />Alameda. <br /> <br /> - I - <br /> , <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.