My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
122121
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2021 3:53:16 PM
Creation date
12/15/2021 3:30:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/21/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approval to the City Council. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notices of this application were sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br />1,000 -foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and noticing map as Exhibit D for <br />reference. At the time this report was published, no public comment was received by staff. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />On January 4, 2012, the City Council certified a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report <br />SEIR) and adopted the CEQA Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the <br />Housing Element and Climate Action Plan General Plan Amendment and Rezonings <br />Supplemental EIR. This SEIR was a supplement to the EIR prepared for the Pleasanton <br />2005-2025 General Plan which was certified in July 2009. The development contemplated in <br />the DA is consistent with the development density that was evaluated and mitigated as part of <br />these certified CEQA documents which are available upon request as part of Exhibit C. In <br />addition, the City adopted an Addendum dated April 19, 2019, in connection with the <br />Stoneridge Mail Commercial Replacement and Expansion Project, File P18-0340, which <br />concluded the project would not cause any unstudied impacts or impacts peculiar to the parcel. <br />The proposed amendment does not result in any effects on the environment that are peculiar <br />to the property or project that were not addressed in these prior CEQA documents, or which <br />substantial new information shows will be more significant than described in these prior CEQA <br />documents. Therefore, no additional environmental review is required pursuant to Public <br />Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183. <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br />This extension will enable Stoneridge Properties to continue to explore commercial expansion <br />of the Stoneridge Shopping Center, broadening the City's tax base and allowing the continued <br />vitality of the shopping center. This amendment/extension would not alter or modify the <br />obligations and responsibilities described in the original DA or subsequent amendments as <br />they apply to the shopping center. With expectations the shopping center will continue to <br />evolve to remain competitive in the current retail environment, staff supports the request for the <br />amendment/extension and recommends the Planning Commission provide a positive <br />recommendation to the City Council. <br />Primary Authors: Eric Luchini, Senior Planner, 925-931-5612 or eluchini c cityofpieasantonca.gov. <br />Reviewed/Approved By: <br />Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br />Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br />PX17-0904, 1008-1700 Stoneridge Mall Road Planning Commission <br />5of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.