Laserfiche WebLink
feet away from an opening or doorway. She expressed concerns over whether this is logistically <br /> feasible with some of the smaller areas covered by this proposed ordinance. <br /> Councilmember Testa stated she would like to mirror the rental ordinance giving the option to have a <br /> designated smoking area. <br /> In response to Assistant City Attorney Seto, Councilmember Testa stated she would not want the <br /> language about enclosed vehicles also being included in her motion because parking areas are less <br /> significant in terms of second-hand smoke risk. She reported when she worked for Las Positas College <br /> at the time the campus went smoke-free, parked vehicles became the designated smoking areas. She <br /> stated it was a great solution for pulling smoke out of hallways and common areas. She stated she <br /> would support not placing the enforcement responsibility on property owners. She advised they should <br /> also take Alameda County up on its offer of assistance and hear more about how this would work for <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Councilmember Testa clarified her motion is to approve staff's <br /> recommendations, with the addition of the language about inside units, language from the 2017 <br /> ordinance about optional designated smoking areas, language from staff's memo removing the <br /> enforcement onus from property-owners, and not including parked cars in the definition of smoking- <br /> prohibited enclosed areas. She advised she would be agreeable to prohibiting smoking from parked <br /> vehicles if the City Council approves. <br /> Councilmember Arkin seconded the motion. She requested a friendly amendment to direct staff to <br /> explore eliminating the $100 fine for a first violation to be replaced by a smoking cessation or education <br /> program, possibly utilizing Alameda County's programs. Councilmember Testa accepted the <br /> amendment. <br /> Mayor Brown stated she is struggling with the within the unit component because they are making a <br /> significant change in the lives of residents who purchased million-dollar townhomes believing they <br /> could smoke at home. She noted townhome construction quality is better than apartments. <br /> Councilmember Narum agreed with Mayor Brown, citing the element of being owner-occupied making it <br /> more cumbersome to sell the home and move out than with leaving an apartment. She stated she could <br /> not support the motion and advised she did not understand why they would not include parked vehicles <br /> because second-hand smoke emits from doors opening and rolled-down windows. <br /> Councilmember Arkin stated the difference with smoking in a car is not sharing a wall with another <br /> resident where the smoke can seep through. She stated the concern should not be with smoking <br /> townhome purchasers who need to move but rather with their neighbors who now want to move. She <br /> stated the health risks of second-hand smoke are real, particularly among children, and the notion of <br /> banning it indoors has been endorsed by a prominent local pediatrician. She advised they should <br /> probably not be telling people what to do in their own homes but advised it is infringing on the health of <br /> others. She acknowledged the enforcement can be difficult, noting this is why she endorsed some sort <br /> of educational program for first offenders. She compared the likely enforcement measures to the <br /> recently-passed safe firearm storage ordinance. She advised the education and outreach components <br /> will be important. She stated she expects most people to comply. She endorsed having a designated <br /> smoking area. <br /> Councilmember Balch stated he cannot support the motion, echoing comments made by Ms. Bassey. <br /> He stated a lease default and cause for eviction seems difficult. He stated they could work with the <br /> $100 fine. He stated the private party civil suit component is really difficult for him as it encourages <br /> neighbors to video their neighbors as the basis for their lawsuits. He stated smoking is an addiction and <br /> if they treated it as a health issue as opposed to an inconvenience to non-smokers, they might have a <br /> different opinion. He advised diversion to treatment seems like a better solution. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 18 December 7, 2021 <br />