My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
120721
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2021 3:50:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2021 3:50:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/7/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fine for the first violation, a $200 fine for the second violation within a year, and a $500 <br /> fine for subsequent violations within a year. <br /> The proposed ordinance also provides that: <br /> 1. Landlords need to inform their tenants of these smoking restrictions and include <br /> language in leases (see Attachment 1, proposed §9.27.035.); <br /> 2. Homeowners' associations can be contacted by City staff to assist with <br /> enforcement (see Attachment 1, proposed §9.27.040.C.2.); <br /> 3. Individuals can bring private civil actions (see Attachment 1, proposed <br /> §9.27.045.A.). <br /> A combination of private and City enforcement is recommended due to the ephemeral <br /> nature of smoking, and time needed for City staff to respond to complaints. <br /> Police Department and Code Enforcement staff advise that they will be better able to <br /> enforce smoking restrictions in common areas and private outdoor areas that can be <br /> observed from a public place. They say it would be challenging to enforce prohibitions in <br /> private indoor areas or inside of a unit. This is based, in part, on lack of probable cause <br /> to enter a home based only on a neighbor's complaint about smelling smoke.6 Staff <br /> would need permission to enter from the homeowner or tenant, during which time any <br /> alleged smoking would likely stop. For buildings with multiple units, a neighbor is not <br /> always accurate about their perception of the source of the smell of smoke. <br /> In the last year, City staff responded to about five to seven complaints monthly about <br /> alleged smoking violations. It would be expected that the proposed new restrictions <br /> would increase the number of complaints. <br /> Outreach. Letters were sent to known homeowners' associations for townhomes and <br /> condominiums, and their management companies, to advise them that these restrictions <br /> would be considered by Council. <br /> If adopted, staff would carry out further outreach to affected property owners and <br /> occupants. <br /> Effective Date. The proposed ordinance is recommended to go into effect July 1, 2022.' <br /> This would give affected members of the public the opportunity to become familiar with <br /> the new restrictions; let owners and homeowners' associations determine how the <br /> restrictions interface with existing private conditions, covenants and restrictions <br /> (CC&Rs); and allow landlords and tenants time to update their leases. In this <br /> recommended interim period, staff would make more information available on the City's <br /> Complaints about"personal conduct", like smoking restrictions, unfortunately sometimes provide an <br /> avenue for neighbors with personal disputes to get City staff involved by frequently calling to report <br /> alleged code violations. Being able to observe from a public place conduct in a common area or outdoor <br /> private area makes enforcement more practical for City staff, and less disruptive to occupants. <br /> If the Council wants the ordinance to go into effect as soon as possible, the ordinance can be introduced <br /> on 12/7/2021, adopted on 12/21/2021, and go into effective on 1/21/2022. <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.