Laserfiche WebLink
making it more divisive. She questioned if it will work in Pleasanton with a widely dispersed minority <br />population. She is not in favor of district elections but reluctantly supports the motion acknowledging the <br />high potential for costly and unsuccessful litigation. <br />Mayor Brown expressed doubts district elections will achieve the goal of diversifying the City Council. <br />She encouraged prospective councilmembers to get involved in a committee or commission as they have <br />done in the past. She advised the community has elected people who stand for what they do regardless <br />of skin color or background. <br />MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Balch to adopt a resolution declaring the City of Pleasanton's intent <br />to transition from an at -large election system to a district -based election system. The Motion passed <br />by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Arkin, Balch, Narum, Testa, Mayor Brown <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Mayor Brown recessed the City Council at 9:51 p.m. and reconvened the City Council at 9:58 p.m. <br />20. Housing Element Update — Review and approve the final housing sites selection criteria for the 6th <br />Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element Update and receive the Housing Element Community Survey <br />Summary Report <br />Community Development Director Ellen Clark advised the goal is that the site selection process is <br />completed by the end of the year. The City's mandatory Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) <br />number is 5,965 units. The gap between the RHNA and the number of units existing residential zones <br />sites can yield is about 1,500 very -low to low-income units and about 2,000 moderate to above -moderate <br />income units. <br />Director Clark reported the guiding principles of conforming to the General Plan, "smart growth," <br />California Tax Credit Allocation Criteria (TCAC), and following State law, were all carried over from the <br />fourth cycle. There are 31 criteria in seven categories for an initial scoring. A yes or no will award one <br />point per criterion, leading to a final score for each potential site. Later rounds of review will include <br />additional policy considerations. <br />The seven categories are the site's size and infill criteria, proximity to modes of transportation, proximity <br />to services and amenities, environmental impacts, impacts to sensitive resources, height and mass <br />compatibility, and interest in the site. The Planning Commission recommended inclusion or modification <br />of considerations for the proximity to recycled water availability, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) proximity, <br />natural hazard areas, and the vacancy and underutilization of a site. <br />Associate Planner Jennifer Hagen detailed community outreach to date and results of a community -wide <br />survey. A popular theme from the responses included a call for locations close to transit, services, and <br />freeways. Staff recommends the City Council review and approve the final criteria for the initial ranking, <br />scoring, and selection of sites to be considered for the sixth cycle Housing Element Update. <br />Councilmember Testa stated all of the schools are already beyond capacity and does not think this <br />component should be considered as a criterion. She hopes the Pleasanton Unified School District <br />(PUSD) would prepare appropriately for the growth the City will be experiencing. She does not agree with <br />the criteria of streamlining natural hazard areas into a single criterion since their risks differ greatly. <br />In response to Councilmember Arkin, Director Clark clarified the State has screening criteria it applies to <br />site selection which the City has incorporated. Director Clark advised there is a general noise criterion, <br />but they have not proposed specifying the flight path from Livermore Municipal Airport. Typically, the <br />City Council Minutes Page 10 of 14 September 21, 2021 <br />