|
• Discussion Question No. 4: Should the proposed project be required to extend the
<br /> proposed sidewalk on the north side of Diamond Court to Sunol Boulevard and the
<br /> project applicant bear the cost of construction and tree removal/replacement?
<br /> PUBLIC COMMENT
<br /> Notices of the work session were sent to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the project
<br /> site, and a notice was also published in The Valley Times. Staff has not received any
<br /> comments at the time this report was prepared.
<br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
<br /> Since the Planning Commission will take no formal action on the project at the work session,
<br /> no environmental document accompanies this work session report.
<br /> Primary Author:
<br /> Jenny Soo, Associate Planner, 925-931-5615 or jsoo(c�citvofpleasantonca.gov
<br /> Reviewed/Approved By:
<br /> Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager
<br /> Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development
<br /> PUD-137, 375 Sycamore Road Planning Commission
<br /> 15 of 15
<br />sed sidewalk along the north side of Diamond Court should be extended to Sunol
<br /> Boulevard.
<br /> The extension is possible as the adjoining property at 6800 Sunol Boulevard has already
<br /> granted to the City a five-foot easement along the north side of Diamond Court. In staff's view,
<br /> this 5-foot easement to the City could be used to accommodate the sidewalk extension from
<br /> the project site to Sunol Boulevard.
<br /> Staff has discussed this item with the project design team who to this point has shown
<br /> reservations about including this improvement as part of their plans. Despite this, staff
<br /> continues to recommend the sidewalk extension should be part of the proposed development,
<br /> although it is noted the sidewalk extension may result in additional tree removal along the
<br /> Diamond Court frontage of 6088 Sunol Blvd and may therefore require agreements to be
<br /> reached between the two property owners as to how to address tree removal and replacement.
<br /> Discussion Question No. 4: Should the proposed project be required to extend the proposed
<br /> sidewalk on the north side of Diamond Court to Sunol Boulevard and the project applicant bear
<br /> the cost of construction and tree removal/replacement?
<br /> CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION TOPICS
<br /> The proposed project meets the land use density of the General Plan and NSSP. With the
<br /> above discussion in areas of combined side yard setback, architectural styles, and street
<br /> improvements, the following questions are where staff would find the Commission's input most
<br /> helpful.
<br /> • Discussion Question No. 1: Would the Planning Commission concur the proposed
<br /> development is consistent with the General Plan and NSSP?
<br /> • Discussion Question No. 2: Would the Planning Commission consider allowing
<br /> flexibility in combined side yard setbacks and support the proposed development
<br /> standards?
<br /> • Discussion Questions 3: Would the Planning Commission find the proposed
<br /> architectural styles, building mass and house size be compatible and comparable with
<br /> the existing neighborhood therefore acceptable?
<br /> PUD-137, 375 Sycamore Road Planning Commission
<br /> 14 of 15
<br />
<br /> V- rt'A`s. '.4•1•-•...-sl. heibi. , 445.46. . tvfk - ft. 4,-
<br /> e•
<br /> t4,"V. • ., ...e. . 1
<br /> -1.- „56.. ,41:31•Piic:1::' it gt.
<br /> r: 1\41; t.o4 ' b v,.• N A 6.\,cok. -,%- ire P
<br /> „,..:A.”-:-.•(.*...t,.. illu:...- li .4.8a; ittti pitIAL51-4.:01,7;--14- -z. (..5s '4:1'1' . .7....4"1/r. -412 •'''''';:: (*wt.,'
<br /> • .... .3
<br /> 411
<br /> • ging'erVI • %\t;''
<br /> til 3.
<br /> 4-4 .07. lie4 .1) 44- •
<br /> ' c:f.c.) z x t• ii .
<br /> ie PIAR(.3.1 11
<br /> t .. ,.$ , ,...",,,t1:,. -4, ' '?r!'• '. .#e di •uj' 1; 0:11 11
<br /> tr... za. cli• ,.,... . 126* e:t4,104.,- z FM ,::2.510 6.K.44ve ..r• „n•et.' .r---3 7-
<br /> A.
<br /> L.0 16.o6• •
<br /> "- ,...iaraf--LEL. I i-LI.ZliCe ottD•14' '.:01$01"-
<br /> •* fl
<br /> "Z S A f 3 . OMOM4 44
<br /> CD
<br /> . .
<br /> i
<br /> Ser
<br /> . V
<br /> •C 4- . ... .
<br /> 41,*-ni t 1101 1444 t ts k t rii -' .c:;.0 PAR C E i 7 ; _1
<br /> 4..'•
<br /> PARCEL P.1
<br /> I Cr.510 ...
<br /> k W4 ill
<br /> •f:
<br /> y Its
<br /> PM
<br /> Ii; 1
<br /> rA RiIi_ E3 1j 1. ..),, -"TT.)"NI ;:.'.f7.•![....? o , 1 i.1 .. .. 5
<br /> t V Vi
<br /> • )
<br /> RECOrIDERS MEMO ---.}
<br /> LENBILITY FOR NICPORt,ING MD
<br /> CPPY1')G tifh•APSFACrOry Pi .1 POHTION
<br /> nt 71.IC I 1-.. t III. 1,1 ll' ,, ..• ",-,-,...•... ft
<br />
|