My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092221
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC 092221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2021 11:36:48 AM
Creation date
10/29/2021 11:36:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/22/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Brown stated the data was from 2013-2019, published in 2021, and questioned about <br /> the shift in data due to the pandemic and jobs that might permanently transition to working <br /> remotely from home. David Bergman, Lisa Wise Consulting, stated the structure of the labor <br /> market mattered and that the type of labor market might rebound but it was to be determined. <br /> Chair Brown stated he was trying to understand the high-tech sector as it related to the City's <br /> labor force. Mr. Bergman responded that data could be provided on the high industrial section <br /> and occupational structure. Chair Brown requested data on high tech, remote work to provide <br /> housing where the workplace existed. <br /> Commissioner Nibert requested information on essential workers residing in Pleasanton. Ms. <br /> Clark suggested clearly defining essential worker/workforce group, since it could encompass <br /> many professions. Commissioner Nibert mentioned public comment received related to an <br /> inventory of for rent and for sale affordable and senior housing. Ms. Clark indicated a list of <br /> deed restricted affordable housing projects in Pleasanton could be provided. Ms. Hagen stated <br /> all existing inventory and existing projects would be included in the site inventory appendix, <br /> which would be brought to the Commission at a later date. Ms. Clark noted a comment <br /> received related to units at risk of conversion, and stated there were no units at risk of <br /> conversion in Pleasanton. <br /> Chair Brown mentioned points raised during the September 21 , 2021 Council Meeting <br /> regarding racial mix of diversity and whether it was evenly distributed throughout the City. Ms. <br /> Clark stated that data would need to be further gathered, but mentioned the Affirmatively <br /> Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) analysis which would look closely at the distribution of various <br /> populations in the city. <br /> Commissioner Morgan mentioned the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) numbers <br /> and explained he considered the percentage of Pleasanton employees that could afford <br /> market rate or affordable units. Ms. Clark explained that the income limits set by the State <br /> determined the income a typical household needed to afford either a purchase or rental, but a <br /> household could include workers in various job categories and wage levels. Commissioner <br /> Morgan asked if data was available on wage levels of jobs in Pleasanton to match to housing. <br /> Ms. Clark stated wage information by sector could help illustrate this data, understanding that <br /> a sector can contain many different sorts of jobs, at varying wage levels. Commissioner <br /> Morgan anticipated a high level of employees could not afford housing in Pleasanton. Ms. <br /> Clark concurred that the data showed the majority of households could not afford the median <br /> priced for sale unit and a large portion could not afford rental units, without being cost <br /> burdened. <br /> Commissioner Nibert discussed the stakeholder group overview, providing 12 various inputs <br /> related to housing needs. He stated he understood that staff would consider all public <br /> comments and information. He followed up to a previous comment made by Commissioner <br /> Morgan and mentioned below market rate occupants are still cost burdened; he further <br /> discussed a recent article he read where another city had entered into an affordable housing <br /> contract that had reduced rent of a standard below market rate apartment about $200. He <br /> mentioned that although it was a reduction, it was still priced rather high, and expressed his <br /> concern that even after completing this process, if the root of the problem is not addressed, the <br /> City might face a similar situation where the housing needs would not be fulfilled. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 10 September 22, 2021 <br />