18 - Laserfiche WebLink

underestimation or an unexpected challenge to effective implementation may curtail the City's ability to meet its 2030 target. Limiting the actions also reduces the resilience and adaptation actions being pursued and ignores cost effectiveness. Recommended Actions Package On balance, considering all of the actions, the qualitative factors reviewed (e.g., community support), the Cost -Benefit Analysis, and the desire to strike a balance between creating an achievable, but not overly narrow list of actions, staff has developed a recommended package of actions that includes 15 primary actions (predominately GHG mitigation) and 10 secondary actions (predominately resilience/adaptation), as described further below and seen in Attachment 2. The full text of the proposed actions can be seen in Attachment 3. Primary Actions Staff recommends a set of 15 primary actions which are largely GHG mitigating actions. As seen in Figure 4 below, the list includes actions in several sectors including Buildings and Energy (BE), Transportation and Land Use (T&LU), Materials and Consumption (M&C), Natural Systems (NS), and Community Resilience and Wellbeing (CR&W). Staff recommends a mixture of large-scale actions (i.e., programs and initiatives that will take multiple years to implement) and small-scale actions (i.e., actions which are relatively quick to execute and can provide small, achievable successes that incrementally contribute to meaningful GHG reductions over -time). The mix of actions accounts for GHG mitigation, City cost, staffing assumptions, community cost, co -benefits, and community input. Implementing the primary actions will cost the City approximately $1.1 million and save the community approximately $1.2 million the through 10 -year implementation of the plan. Page 7 of 11