Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br />Since the November 2020 City Council meeting, an initial list of more than 150 potential <br />CAP 2.0 actions was prepared based on review of the City's initial Climate Action Plan, <br />review of best practices and recently adopted CAPs, and input from the public, City <br />staff, the Committee (including the action workshop), and focus groups with <br />stakeholders and implementation partners (e.g., East Bay Community Energy, Zone 7, <br />and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District). The action list was reviewed <br />through several outreach meetings including with commissions, the community (e.g., at <br />a community workshop and through a community survey), and the Committee. <br />Attachment 1 is a summary of the outreach done to date. <br />Based on the feedback received, the actions were modified, clarified, and combined. <br />Action 1164 Existing Building Electrification represents the most substantive change <br />based on the outreach. Across the outreach meetings, concerns were raised regarding <br />existing building electrification mandates. Given the concerns regarding regulatory <br />aspects of this action that were daylighted throughout the outreach process, the action <br />was modified to remove the regulatory components of this action. The action now <br />focuses on grid resilience, evaluation of existing buildings, municipal building <br />electrification, voluntary and incentive -based community building electrification, <br />outreach and education, and tracking progress toward electrification in Pleasanton. <br />The initial list of more than 150 actions was then reduced to a shorter list of <br />approximately 50 actions that qualitatively ranked highly across the action selection <br />criteria (i.e., effectiveness, cost, feasibility, level of community support, equity, and co - <br />benefits). A quantitative analysis was then prepared for the short list of actions which <br />includes estimated costs and GHG emissions reductions for each action on the short <br />list. This Cost -Benefit Analysis was then used to recommend a final set of actions for <br />inclusion in the CAP 2.0. Staff recommends a set of 15 primary actions and 10 <br />secondary actions for inclusion in the CAP 2.0 with the Committee recommending one <br />additional primary action, as detailed further below. The set of recommended actions is <br />summarized in Attachment 2. Attachment 3 provides the full text of the proposed <br />actions. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Several combinations of actions can achieve the CAP 2.0 emissions reductions <br />pathway and the Council will need to make a strategic decision about the final package <br />of new actions, recognizing various tradeoffs to be made between cost and <br />effectiveness in reaching GHG targets. <br />As described further below, staff does not recommend including every action analyzed <br />in the Cost -Benefit Analysis. It is worth noting that an Implementation and Monitoring <br />Plan will be developed as part of CAP 2.0, which will identify potential funding sources <br />(e.g., grants and federal, state, and local funding measures) that will help to offset costs <br />of implementation estimated in the Cost -Benefit Analysis. <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />