My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
110221
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2021 2:20:16 PM
Creation date
10/27/2021 2:20:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/2/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Per California state law, a person may be criminally liable under Penal Code section <br />25100 et. seq. if all of the following occur: 1) the person keeps any firearm within any <br />premises that are under the person's custody or control; 2) the person knows or <br />reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm without the <br />permission of the child's parent or legal guardian, or that a person prohibited from <br />possessing a firearm is likely to gain access to the firearm; and 3) the child or prohibited <br />person obtains access the firearm and thereby causes injury or carries the firearm to a <br />public place. <br />The attached proposed ordinance fills a gap in state law by specifying what are <br />acceptable safe storage practices for firearms within residences thus rendering moot <br />the question of whether a gun owner should have "reasonably known" that a child or <br />prohibited person was likely to access the firearm. Numerous counties and cities in <br />California have adopted similar ordinances to the one proposed, including but not <br />limited to the cities of Dublin (December 2020), Palo Alto, San Jose, and Redwood City. <br />The proposed ordinance will be added to Chapter 10.12 (Weapons) of the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code (PMC) with enforcement covered in section 1.12 (General Penalty) of <br />the PMC. Accordingly, a violation of PMC section 10.12.040 will be an infraction, <br />punishable by a $100 fine (per firearm) for the first violation and greater fines for repeat <br />violations. If a person violates the ordinance more than three times in any 12 -month <br />period, the violation will be a misdemeanor. Administrative citations, with the same <br />fines from PMC section 1.12, may also able be used to address violations. This is <br />aligned with similar municipal codes with regards to firearms. For example, this is the <br />same penalty as 10.12.010, which regulates the discharge of a firearm within the city <br />limits. Staff did not believe the storage of firearms should be carry a stricter penalty <br />than the discharge of a firearm, which is inherently more dangerous than the safe <br />storage of a firearm. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The proposed ordinance seeks to curb access to firearms by children and other <br />individuals who may be at risk of harming themselves or others by requiring persons to <br />store firearms in residences in either a locked container or with a trigger lock. If <br />approved, the proposed ordinance will take effect and be enforced 30 days following a <br />second reading. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.