My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
110221
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2021 2:08:49 PM
Creation date
10/27/2021 2:08:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/2/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
police department and sees less use of force in reports which is the goal. She noted police <br />officers have made it clear the use of force is a last resort and their preference is to work through <br />situations without it. <br />Item 18 was continued to the next meeting of the City Council. <br />Mayor Brown recessed the meeting at 10:05 p.m. and reconvened at 10:12 p.m. <br />17. Approve Funding Plan for Per -and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) Treatment and Wells Rehabilitation <br />Project <br />Finance Director Tina Olson reported on June 15th, staff presented to City Council the PFAS and <br />Wells Rehabilitation Project where it was agreed staff should proceed with a detailed design and <br />return to City Council with a funding plan. She reported the design and California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA) documents will run through the Fiscal Year 2022/23 and advised the first <br />procurement and construction contract will be awarded in fall 2022 with the project completed in <br />the winter of 2025. <br />Director Olson advised the main strategy is to minimize the impact to the water rates, minimize <br />the use of debt because the debt service will have to be put back into the rates, and ensure <br />funding is available when the project needs it. She presented the funding framework by Fiscal <br />Year and reported the $3.3 million in Water Operations funds is the fully -funded CEQA and design <br />the City Council already approved. She explained Connection Fees and Financing, Settlement <br />Proceeds, and Grants are interchangeable for a total of $31.4 million. <br />Director Olson reported $3.3 million from the Water Operating Fund has already been allocated <br />and $6 million will be allocated in FY 2023/24 and FY 2024/25. She reported $2 million will be <br />allocated each year in the next Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Staff is proposing the PFAS <br />project be the highest priority with the Water Operating Funds in the CIP process. <br />She reported Connection Fees are the Development Impact Fees for water and sewer systems. <br />An Impact Connection Fee Study has not been conducted since the 1980s for either the water or <br />sewer fees and noted Consumer Price Index (CPI) is also not attached to the fees. The goal is to <br />conduct a Fee Study once the Master Plan is completed which is expected to be in place by the <br />end of FY 2022/23. There is $4 million available in the Water Connection Fee Fund that can be <br />allocated to the project and is proposing a total of $5.3 million be allocated. She noted it is quite <br />likely the remaining $1.3 million will not be available through the end of the project and will need <br />an interfund loan. <br />There is a possibility of receiving Bureau of Reclamation Smart Water Program grant funds of <br />$1.5 million since the project is an eligible cost. The State has money for water projects and <br />PFAS/Well Projects may be eligible. Townsend and Associates will conduct research and write <br />the grants as funding becomes eligible for these projects. The real issue is timing and the bond <br />principal will be reduced by the amount of the grant funds received, and if the grant funds are <br />received after the project starts, bond proceeds will be used to pay debt service and adjusting the <br />water rates accordingly at the time. <br />Director Olson reported hiring PFM which is the City's Financial Advisor to look at all the financing <br />options including different Federal and State programs and Revenue Bonds. She reported the <br />preferred option is the State Revolving Fund Loan Program (SRF) which has an interest rate of <br />1.8% and would be $7.7 million less in total debt service than issuing Revenue Bonds. The <br />drawback is that it will require additional environmental review including looking at all the <br />alternatives like Zone 7. She noted the state agency would have to review and approve all the <br />conclusions from the study and is concerned it could delay the project's start. The State <br />City Council Minutes Page 12 of 16 September 7, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.