13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Figure A-16: Households by Household Income Level ■ 0%-30% of AMI +- 31%-50% of AMI ■ 51%-80% of AMI 81 %-100% of AMI ■ Greater than 100% of AMI Notes: Universe: Occupied housing units Income groups are based on HUD calculations for Area Median Income (AMI). HUD calculates the AMI ford ifferent metropolitan areas, and the nine county Bay Area includes the following metropolitan areas: Napa Metro Area (Napa County), Oakland -Fremont Metro Area (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), San Francisco Metro Area (Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties), San Jose -Sunnyvale -Santa Clara Metro Area (Santa Clara County), Santa Rosa Metro Area (Sonoma County), and Vallejo - Fairfield Metro Area (Solano County). The AMI levels in this chart are based on the HUD metro area where this jurisdiction is located. The data that is reported for the Bay Area is not based on a regional AMI but instead refers to the regional total of households in an income group relative to the AMI for the county where that household is located. Local jurisdictions are required to provide an estimate for their projected extremely low-income households (0-30% AMI) in their Housing Elements. HCD's official Housing Element guidance notes that jurisdictions can use their RHNA for very low-income households (those making 0-50% AMI) to calculate their projected extremely low-income households. As Bay Area jurisdictions have not yet received their final RHNA numbers, this document does not contain the required data point of projected extremely low-income households. The report portion of the housing data needs packet contains more specific guidance for how local staff can calculate an estimate for projected extremely low-income households once jurisdictions receive their 6th cycle RHNA numbers. Source: ABAG 2021 Pre -certified Housing Needs Data (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 release) Throughout the region, there are disparities between the incomes of homeowners and renters. Typically, the number of low-income renters greatly outpaces the amount of housing available that is affordable for these households. In Pleasanton, the largest proportion of both renters and owners falls in the Greater than 100 percent of AMI income group (see Figure A-17). The only income group in Pleasanton with more renters than owners is the extremely low-income group (0-30 percent of AMI). Housing Needs Assessment City of Pleasanton I A-21 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% Alameda County Bay Area t 70.0% 60.0% 0 = 50.0% 0 y 40.0% 30.0% a 20.0% 10.0% s< 0.0% Pleasanton ■ 0%-30% of AMI +- 31%-50% of AMI ■ 51%-80% of AMI 81 %-100% of AMI ■ Greater than 100% of AMI Notes: Universe: Occupied housing units Income groups are based on HUD calculations for Area Median Income (AMI). HUD calculates the AMI ford ifferent metropolitan areas, and the nine county Bay Area includes the following metropolitan areas: Napa Metro Area (Napa County), Oakland -Fremont Metro Area (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), San Francisco Metro Area (Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties), San Jose -Sunnyvale -Santa Clara Metro Area (Santa Clara County), Santa Rosa Metro Area (Sonoma County), and Vallejo - Fairfield Metro Area (Solano County). The AMI levels in this chart are based on the HUD metro area where this jurisdiction is located. The data that is reported for the Bay Area is not based on a regional AMI but instead refers to the regional total of households in an income group relative to the AMI for the county where that household is located. Local jurisdictions are required to provide an estimate for their projected extremely low-income households (0-30% AMI) in their Housing Elements. HCD's official Housing Element guidance notes that jurisdictions can use their RHNA for very low-income households (those making 0-50% AMI) to calculate their projected extremely low-income households. As Bay Area jurisdictions have not yet received their final RHNA numbers, this document does not contain the required data point of projected extremely low-income households. The report portion of the housing data needs packet contains more specific guidance for how local staff can calculate an estimate for projected extremely low-income households once jurisdictions receive their 6th cycle RHNA numbers. Source: ABAG 2021 Pre -certified Housing Needs Data (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 release) Throughout the region, there are disparities between the incomes of homeowners and renters. Typically, the number of low-income renters greatly outpaces the amount of housing available that is affordable for these households. In Pleasanton, the largest proportion of both renters and owners falls in the Greater than 100 percent of AMI income group (see Figure A-17). The only income group in Pleasanton with more renters than owners is the extremely low-income group (0-30 percent of AMI). Housing Needs Assessment City of Pleasanton I A-21 Alameda County Bay Area ■ 0%-30% of AMI +- 31%-50% of AMI ■ 51%-80% of AMI 81 %-100% of AMI ■ Greater than 100% of AMI Notes: Universe: Occupied housing units Income groups are based on HUD calculations for Area Median Income (AMI). HUD calculates the AMI ford ifferent metropolitan areas, and the nine county Bay Area includes the following metropolitan areas: Napa Metro Area (Napa County), Oakland -Fremont Metro Area (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), San Francisco Metro Area (Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties), San Jose -Sunnyvale -Santa Clara Metro Area (Santa Clara County), Santa Rosa Metro Area (Sonoma County), and Vallejo - Fairfield Metro Area (Solano County). The AMI levels in this chart are based on the HUD metro area where this jurisdiction is located. The data that is reported for the Bay Area is not based on a regional AMI but instead refers to the regional total of households in an income group relative to the AMI for the county where that household is located. Local jurisdictions are required to provide an estimate for their projected extremely low-income households (0-30% AMI) in their Housing Elements. HCD's official Housing Element guidance notes that jurisdictions can use their RHNA for very low-income households (those making 0-50% AMI) to calculate their projected extremely low-income households. As Bay Area jurisdictions have not yet received their final RHNA numbers, this document does not contain the required data point of projected extremely low-income households. The report portion of the housing data needs packet contains more specific guidance for how local staff can calculate an estimate for projected extremely low-income households once jurisdictions receive their 6th cycle RHNA numbers. Source: ABAG 2021 Pre -certified Housing Needs Data (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 release) Throughout the region, there are disparities between the incomes of homeowners and renters. Typically, the number of low-income renters greatly outpaces the amount of housing available that is affordable for these households. In Pleasanton, the largest proportion of both renters and owners falls in the Greater than 100 percent of AMI income group (see Figure A-17). The only income group in Pleasanton with more renters than owners is the extremely low-income group (0-30 percent of AMI). Housing Needs Assessment City of Pleasanton I A-21