My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton is a net importer of workers forjobs at all wage levels, although this is most pronounced <br />for lower -wage jobs. Only 8% of people employed in Pleasanton also live in Pleasanton, which can <br />contribute to traffic congestion. <br />• Over 70% of Pleasanton's housing stock is single-family (attached and detached); however, multi- <br />family housing of five or more units has experienced the most growth over the last decade. A variety <br />of housing types is important to meet the needs of all members of the community. <br />The largest proportion of Pleasanton's housing units was built between 1980 and 1999, and only <br />about 6% were built before 1960. While this represents a more recently -built housing stock <br />compared to the county, aging housing units can reflect poorer living standards and higher repair <br />costs. <br />Housing Constraints Assessment <br />City policies and regulations, such as the Zoning Ordinance, and factors outside of the <br />City's control affect the quantity and type of residential development that occur in <br />Pleasanton. The following summarizes key governmental and nongovernmental <br />constraints to housing development. For more detail, please see Appendix C. <br />Governmental Constraints <br />• Subjective design guidelines and findings for approval, while not temporarily applicable to multi- <br />family projects due to State law (SB 330), could result in uncertainty for developers and a longer <br />permit review process in the future. The City is currently preparing objective design standards for <br />residential and mixed-use projects. <br />Pleasanton makes extensive use of Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning to provide flexibility <br />from conventional zoning standards to ensure a comprehensive and inclusive development review <br />process. Although City Council approval is required, projects with higher overall densities, <br />exceptions to standards that achieve a more desirable project, and a greater number of affordable <br />units have been approved through the PUD process than would have been possible through <br />conventional zoning standards. Objective design standards currently being prepared will apply to <br />residential and mixed-use projects and result in a non -discretionary PUD process consistent with <br />the Housing Accountability Act. <br />• Certain zoning provisions will need to be updated to comply with state law (e.g., allow Low Barrier <br />Navigation Centers where residential is allowed (AB 101), allow qualifying supportive housing by - <br />right where residential is allowed (AB 2162), increase density bonus up to 50% (AB 2345), etc.). <br />Nongovernmental Constraints <br />Economic conditions in Pleasanton reflect a competitive housing market for both for -sale and rental <br />housing. <br />2 1 City of Pleasanton <br />Preliminary Report 1 6th Cycle Housing Element <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.