Laserfiche WebLink
CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> Mayor Brown opened public comment. <br /> Chad Horrell, with DoorDash Government Relations, spoke about DoorDash's support of its restaurant <br /> partners. He believes the existing cap creates a false market and has unintended negative implications <br /> for Pleasanton's constituents, customers and delivery drivers. He recommended the temporary order <br /> have a sunset and the order should only apply to platforms that do not already provide a 15% option. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Deputy City Manager Pamela Ott confirmed the current <br /> ordinance is intended to cover those parties who want to be covered. Establishments could choose to <br /> make a separate agreement that would not be covered by the ordinance. Attorney Dan Sodergren <br /> clarified the City is not the enforcement arm under the ordinance; rather, it is a tool for the covered <br /> establishments to set up a cause of action to pursue civilly outside of the City. <br /> Kyle Griffith, with Protect App-Based Drivers & Services (PADS) coalition, wants to help ensure that <br /> app-based services remain available and affordable. He commented it will likely result in increased <br /> costs to consumers, reduced business and revenues for restaurants, and fewer income-earning <br /> opportunities for drivers. The proposal would cap fees paid by restaurants and force prices to rise on <br /> consumers to ensure adequate revenues to provide app delivery services. <br /> Mayor Brown closed public comment. <br /> Councilmember Narum advised she wished to continue with her motion. Councilmember Testa advised <br /> she also wished to continue with her second to the motion. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Deputy City Manager Ott explained the first ordinance was for <br /> one year and noted staff does not know what the long-term impacts of the pandemic are going to be. <br /> She advised the ordinance says it is effective for one year or as otherwise terminated or modified by <br /> the City Council. <br /> Councilmember Balch requested a friendly amendment to change the date to April 22, 2022. The <br /> amendment was not accepted. <br /> Councilmember Arkin agreed with changing the date to April 22, 2022, as the City does not know what <br /> will be happening with COVID-19 at that time and it is likely that it will get extended further. <br /> Councilmember Narum expressed concern with all the big items coming before City Council in the next <br /> six months and does not want to add to that list. <br /> Councilmember Testa advised restaurants still can make different arrangements so she is unsure why <br /> the one-year extension is problematic because it allows for options. <br /> Councilmember Balch advised the item is something the City Council deemed urgent and important <br /> and noted his point is that it should be done conservatively. <br /> Mayor Brown recommended bifurcating the motion to reflect a separate vote for item 8. <br /> City Manager <br /> 1. Approved meeting minutes of June 15 and June 21, 2021 <br /> 2. Designated Vice Mayor Testa as the City's voting delegate and Councilmember Arkin as the <br /> alternate for the League of California Cities 2021 Annual Conference <br /> City Council Minutes Page 2 of 12 August 17. 2021 <br />