Laserfiche WebLink
• Identifying the criteria and scoring system by which new prospective housing sites <br />are to be evaluated. This step is the subject of this meeting and is discussed in <br />greater detail below. <br />Staffs completion of existing land inventory and sites gap analysis. (Anticipated <br />October 2021) <br />Compile a list of prospective sites from various sources, including developer- and <br />property owner- nominated sites, or sites with known interest in housing <br />development; sites with redevelopment capacity based on their characteristics <br />(such as location, size, and existing utilization/underutilization) and other analysis - <br />(September -October 2021) <br />Apply the scoring system to the initial sites list to develop an initial draft ranking of <br />sites for public, Commission and City Council review. This second step of review <br />will also vet other considerations beyond the initial sites ranking — for example, <br />assumptions about site density, affordability levels and whether any increment of <br />sites beyond those exactly needed to meet the gap, would be identified. The City <br />Council's direction regarding the initial list of sites will be carried forward into the <br />required California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis for the project. <br />(Public Meetings in November -December 2021) <br />CEQA Analysis of Sites, including analysis of traffic impacts and any site-specific <br />significant and unavoidable environmental impacts. (January -June 2022) <br />Review and Refinement of Final Sites List for inclusion in the Housing Element, <br />based on outcomes of CEQA process, and community, Commission, and City <br />Council input). (August -December 2022) <br />Note: The Planning Commission and Housing Commission have had the opportunity to <br />review and provide input on the initial draft sites criteria at meetings in August; the <br />Planning Commission's recommendations have been incorporated into the Final Draft <br />Sites Criteria included in Attachment 1. Input from both bodies is described in more detail <br />below. <br />DISCUSSION: SITES SELECTION CRITERIA <br />As noted, to meet the new RHNA it will be necessary for the City to identify and ultimately <br />rezone a number of parcels throughout Pleasanton. In past housing element cycles, the <br />City's efforts have been focused on identifying sites for higher density housing to meet <br />lower-income housing needs. In this cycle, however, it will be necessary to identify sites, <br />beyond those already zoned, to accommodate moderate and above -moderate units as <br />well. <br />To help to screen and rank a potentially long list of sites that may be under consideration <br />for inclusion in the Housing Element, staff proposes to use a set of criteria based on the <br />criteria and scoring system developed in 2010-2011 for use in the 4t" Cycle Housing <br />Page 3 of 12 <br />