20 - Laserfiche WebLink

lr . 2i: 3 Conclusion The objective of this survey was to better understand community opinions on various city-wide issues related to housing; gather constructive feedback on preferences and priorities on new housing development; identify challenges and opportunities; and understand the perspective of the community in addressing housing needs. Overall, the survey provided comprehensive and identifiable themes and feedback that will provide insight into future policy discussions. The survey provided a wide range of varying opinions and perspectives on housing within the city. While opinions and perspective varied from question to question, the respondents engaged in the questions and options presented in the survey, and provided useful input on housing issues, opportunities, locations for future housing, and the types of housing that can best meet the community's housing needs. Although respondents recognized the challenge and intent of the Housing Element to address the mandates of State law, a small but notable proportion took the opportunity to express concerns about new housing and residential growth, and to the mandates being imposed upon the City to plan for new housing. Water supply, school capacity, traffic, and diminution of community character were some of the key growth- and development -related concerns cited by parlicipants. With respect to housing challenges, the most significant housing challenge identified was the lack of affordability and cost burden associated with renting and owning a home in Pleasanton. Seniors and young adults were the groups most strongly identified as being in need of housing support and services; a number of respondents called out lower- and middle-income service workers as a group who could be better served by housing. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are often considered to provide more affordable housing options, which may help in a cost burdened community. However, respondents indicated mixed feelings on ADUs in Pleasanton. Although more respondents agreed that ADU's would provide additional housing options, 60% indicated that they should not be encouraged above and beyond what the City is currently doing in response to state mandates. Beyond ADUs, a number of respondents supported the concept of providing smaller, more affordable units, including encouraging a mix of unit types and sizes in new developments. Pleasanton's appealing community character was brought up throughout the survey and was clearly highly valued among respondents. Concern that new housing would diminish neighborhood or community character was also a theme throughout the survey, and well-designed, quality design and project amenities, as well as neighborhood compatibility, was emphasized by many. This was expressed through preferences such as siting new housing away from existing neighborhoods, into locations where existing development tends to be larger scale and higher intensity, such as along major corridors, within the business park, and in place of existing commercial development. THE Cllr OF PLE ASANTON. 28