Laserfiche WebLink
Since the self-guided tour earlier this year, and in preparation for the current (6th Cycle) <br /> Housing Element update, staff and the VMWP team has been working on revising the 2012 <br /> Housing DG. Two documents are enclosed with this report, a redline version showing the <br /> proposed modifications to the 2012 Housing DG (Exhibit A) using strikeout and underline text, <br /> and for ease of review and reading, a version that incorporates these changes (Exhibit B). The <br /> Planning Commission may wish to focus its review on the "clean" version (Exhibit B), which is <br /> more readable, with reference back to Exhibit A (redline version) to understand the nature of <br /> specific changes made to a particular standard or guideline. <br /> Changes to Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines <br /> Key highlights of proposed changes are summarized below. As noted, the majority of these <br /> changes have been introduced to provide a quantified, objective standards in the place of what <br /> are currently subjective guidelines. In other areas, standards have been strengthened or <br /> augmented to address deficiencies or gaps in the existing Housing DG. <br /> Part 1 (Introduction), Part 2 (PUD Regulations), and Part 4 (Process) <br /> At this time, no changes are proposed to the Introduction (inclusive of the purpose and vision <br /> statement), PUD Regulations3 and Process sections of the document since the focus of the <br /> current update is technical in nature. Staff expects, however, that a future draft of the <br /> document will modify wording regarding review and procedure of projects subject to the <br /> objective design standards, as appropriate to comply with applicable provisions of state law. <br /> Changes to the technical aspects of Part 2, PUD Regulations, are summarized as follows: <br /> • Rear yard setback for accessory structures. The proposed amendments indicate a rear <br /> setback of five feet for accessory structures such as trash enclosures, carports, bike <br /> storage, and other allowed accessory structures, where no rear setback was previously <br /> established. <br /> • Reference to AB 2923 for the BART site and State Density Bonus. Assembly Bill (AB) <br /> 2923, adopted in 2018, establishes a minimum density of 75 dwelling units per acre and <br /> a minimum of five stories, among other standards, for BART-owned property. <br /> Therefore, the revisions to the Housing DG refer to AB 2923 in the sections that refer to <br /> density and height for the BART site. Similarly, the density noted in Table 2.1 is <br /> proposed to be footnoted to indicate that the notated density may be exceeded in <br /> accordance with the State Density Bonus for a qualified project, consistent with state <br /> law. <br /> • Group usable open space. The proposed amendments would establish a tiered <br /> standard for group usable open space, depending on project density. For projects up to <br /> 40 dwelling units per acre, the existing group usable open space requirement of 300 <br /> square feet per dwelling unit would remain, but as an option, the proposed amendments <br /> would allow 250 square feet per unit of group usable open space if the project provides <br /> a public plaza or park with dedicated public access — effectively an incentive to provide <br /> publicly-accessible open space. The amendments would establish a ratio of 250 square <br /> feet and 200 square feet of group usable open space per unit for projects of densities <br /> 3 Changes are in fact proposed to the development standards cited in the PUD Regulations section of the <br /> document, as discussed in this report <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 14 <br />lack of <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 4of14 <br />tive Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 3 of 14 <br />