Laserfiche WebLink
residential single-family lots and additional infill units on the resulting parcels; and, to address <br /> multi-unit residential development on smaller sites whose current zoning allows it. Staff <br /> anticipates providing a set of standards for this type of development in upcoming months for <br /> the Planning Commission's review and consideration, with the goal of having the <br /> comprehensive set of Objective Design Standards adopted with, or shortly after, adoption of <br /> the 6th Cycle Housing Element. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE AND PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Notification of this item has been published in The Valley Times as an upcoming agenda item <br /> for the September, 8, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. Postcard notifications and letters <br /> have been sent to property owners of undeveloped sites that the 2012 Housing DG apply. Staff <br /> has contacted representatives from Hacienda and Simon Properties informing them of this <br /> effort, inviting review and feedback. At the time this report was prepared, staff has not <br /> received specific comments regarding this effort, although representatives from Hacienda and <br /> Simon Properties acknowledged and appreciated the communication. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> The proposed changes to the 2012 Housing DG seek to modify existing subjective standards <br /> and guidelines into objective standards, as is required by state law. The changes to the 2012 <br /> Housing DG are intended to apply to the sites identified in the document, although a future <br /> draft could include additional sites, as deemed appropriate by the current (6th Cycle) Housing <br /> Element update process. <br /> Primary Author: Shweta Bonn, Senior Planner, 925-931-5611 or sbonn(a�cityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> Reviewed/Approved By: <br /> Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 14 of 14 <br />cated along transit corridors or in/near retail centers and <br /> office or research and development locations (and other appropriate locations as <br /> determined by the community) <br /> • Unit entries are required along the street and buildings are required to be detailed <br /> • Vehicular parking is discrete, located in subgrade podiums or garages <br /> • The high-density projects create gathering places for the community, and encourage <br /> mixed-use where retail can be successful <br /> The consultant team from VMWP, which has extensive experience working in these and <br /> similar communities, will lead this portion of the presentation, and help facilitate input from the <br /> Planning Commission on the sorts of considerations that may be particularly important to <br /> Pleasanton with respect to design of higher density housing types, and whether this is a <br /> concept that should be further explored through the Housing Element update. <br /> Next Steps <br /> Comments and feedback from the Planning Commission at this meeting will be incorporated <br /> into the next draft of the document, and staff anticipates that the next revision presented to the <br /> Planning Commission will include sites that are selected for the current Housing Element (6th <br /> Cycle update). In the interim and over the next few months as part of the Housing Element <br /> update process, staff will seek guidance and recommendations from the Planning Commission <br /> regarding potential new sites and associated densities for each potential new site. <br /> While the documents enclosed with this agenda report (and to be appended to reflect future <br /> Housing Element sites) apply to larger-scale, higher density development, the project team will <br /> also be working on objective standards for smaller-scale infill development. In particular, staff <br /> recommends these standards address pending state legislation that would allow the splitting of <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 13 of 14 <br />