My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071421
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC 071421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2021 11:50:36 AM
Creation date
8/26/2021 11:50:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/14/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Applicant Tim Sbranti thanked staff and the community for their support. He provided a brief <br /> introduction to the project. <br /> Architect Michael Goldsworthy provided comment and highlighted some of the modifications <br /> made based on comments from the Commission during the April 14, 2021 Work Session. <br /> Father Niko Bekris expressed gratitude for the opportunity and thanked the Commission. <br /> Scott Raty provided his support of the project and thanked and complimented staff on the <br /> project. He referenced his previously submitted correspondence from the April 14, 2021 Work <br /> Session and provided his continued support of the project. <br /> Steve Van Dorn, Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, provided his support for the project. <br /> Petros Xides provided his support for the project. He stated he felt the church would serve as a <br /> permanent home for the culture and faith community. <br /> Yianna Theodorou provided her support of the project. She referenced cultural events and the <br /> value of service. <br /> Tom Wright discussed his church in the community and indicated support for the proposed <br /> project. <br /> Applicant Guy Houston expressed appreciation for the Planning Commission's discussion of <br /> use of the kitchen; and discussed the functioning well to be used for landscaping; trees along <br /> Dublin Canyon; and notification and outreach to the neighbors. He discussed the distance of <br /> the property to the east from the proposed church. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> Commissioner Allen asked about wedding events and referenced Page 8 of 15 which indicated <br /> weddings and receptions could go from 12 p.m. to 11 p.m. with anticipated attendees of 250. <br /> She questioned whether headlights would impact the neighbors. Mr. Houston confirmed that <br /> the tree density, house siting and distance from the Otto's property line would reduce light <br /> impacts, and that large evening events that would cause people to drive and park at the far <br /> end of the lot would be rare. He stated he felt strongly that it was a non-issue. Ms. Hagen <br /> confirmed that the second page of the written narrative indicated occasional wedding and <br /> baptism ceremonies could go until 11 p.m. Commissioner Allen requested the applicant work <br /> with the neighbor to ensure all concerns were rectified; the applicant agreed to do this. <br /> Commissioner Morgan inquired about the landscape architect conditions to modify the plans to <br /> incorporate native oak trees and native shrubs. Ms. Hagen confirmed the proposed plantings <br /> and indicated efforts would be made to incorporate additional native species. <br /> Commissioner Allen expressed excitement about the project and the benefit to the community <br /> and commended the applicant and church for working with staff and the neighbors to reach <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 10 July 14, 2021 <br />egation size, and parking requirements and use for larger events. She discussed the <br /> option to use of well water for landscaping. She presented a visual of the proposed tree <br /> removal due to conflict with the driveway and utility infrastructure and poor health. She <br /> discussed the undergrounding of utilities between the parking lot and right-of-way. <br /> Chair Brown stated he had no questions and as previously mentioned he believes the <br /> applicant has done a nice job addressing the concerns raised during the April 14, 2021 Work <br /> Session. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 10 July 14, 2021 <br />tion for the two projects <br /> to complete the improvements, with the City reimbursing the applicants for the cost. <br /> Commissioner Allen suggested information on the cost to complete the CIP in conjunction with <br /> the two projects. Ms. Amos explained the need to pay prevailing wages if City monies were <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 10 July 14, 2021 <br />