My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071421
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC 071421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2021 11:50:36 AM
Creation date
8/26/2021 11:50:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/14/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
parcels measuring approximately 21,794 square feet (Parcel A) and approximately 48,311 <br /> square feet (Parcel B); and 2) Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan <br /> approval to retain the existing home and related improvements on Parcel B and construct <br /> a two-story home and related site improvements on Parcel A. Zoning is PUD-LDR <br /> (Planned Unit Development — Low Density Residential) District. <br /> 5. P21-0076 and PUD-141, Terry Townsend, 2215 Martin Avenue —Applications for: 1) <br /> Minor Subdivision approval to subdivide an approximately 1.67-acre parcel into two parcels <br /> measuring approximately 21,986 square feet (Parcel A) and approximately 49,951 square <br /> feet (Parcel B); and 2) Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval to <br /> retain the existing home and related improvements on Parcel B and construct a two-story <br /> home and related site improvements on Parcel A. Zoning is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit <br /> Development — Low Density Residential) District. <br /> Commissioner Allen requested, for the public's benefit, that staff share the contents of the <br /> memo sent to the Commission prior to the meeting related to the sidewalk concerns for Items <br /> 4 and 5. <br /> Ms. Amos provided information regarding the staff memo previously distributed to the <br /> Commission related to the sidewalk and current project conditions of approval, noting the <br /> memo clarified the requirement for installation of sidewalks along the Dennis Drive frontage <br /> and the two referenced applications. She confirmed the agenda reports for both projects <br /> implied the City would be accepting funding in lieu of requiring the projects to complete <br /> roadway widening and street installation, however, that was not reflected in the Conditions of <br /> Approval (COAs) recommended before the Commission. She stated COA No. 35 for PUD-140 <br /> and COA No. 36 for PUD-141 referenced the subdivision improvement agreement where the <br /> property owners or subdivider would need to enter into a subdivision improvement agreement <br /> with the City to ensure the completion of the required work would be completed by the <br /> subdivider. She further clarified that COA No. 86 for PUD-140 and COA No.87 for PUD-141 <br /> conditioned the project developer to install a five-foot sidewalk along the project frontage for <br /> Dennis Drive. She further discussed the gap in the sidewalk in front of 3520 Dennis Drive, <br /> noting City Council approval of an application in 2006 at 2001 Martin Drive which was similar <br /> to the current applications for PUD-140 and PUD-141 to subdivide the lot and develop a <br /> single-family residence in the front. She stated, at that time, City Council accepted funds in lieu <br /> of the subdivider installing the sidewalk and widening Dennis Drive, however, that work had <br /> not yet been included with any of the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Projects. She <br /> stated, if installation of the sidewalk were to be constructed along the Dennis Drive frontage, it <br /> would require City Council to take action for additional funding due to the increase of materials <br /> and labor costs over the past 15 years, in addition to including the work within a future CIP <br /> project to complete the gap in the sidewalk along that portion of Dennis Drive. <br /> Ms. Amos presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Commissioner Nibert noted he visited the site and noticed items similar to the written public <br /> comments received, particularly comments from Mike and Margaret Quinn, and Steve Grau <br /> and Jenny Grau, who expressed their concerns regarding completion of the sidewalk and <br /> roadway widening along Dennis Drive. He agreed that the concern was related to safety, <br /> noting the narrow condition of Dennis Drive. He continued stating the width of the sidewalk <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 10 July 14, 2021 <br />