My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 211236
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2021
>
RES 211236
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2021 11:16:45 AM
Creation date
8/19/2021 11:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/17/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
NOTES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CHURCH 11300 DUBLIN CANYON ROAD
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 21-1236 <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON APPROVING <br /> AN APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND <br /> OPERATE A 9,792-SQUARE-FOOT CHURCH AND 24,971-SQUARE-FOOT MULTI- <br /> PURPOSE BUILDING WITH GYMNASIUM ON A 4.3-ACRE PORTION OF THE 16- <br /> ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 11300 DUBLIN CANYON ROAD, AS FILED UNDER CASE <br /> NO. P20-0994 <br /> WHEREAS, on November 30, 2020, Guy Houston, on behalf of Resurrection Greek <br /> Orthodox Church ("Applicant") applied for a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a <br /> 9,792-square-foot church and 24,971-square-foot multi-purpose building with gymnasium on a <br /> 4.3-acre portion of the 16-acre site ("Project) located at 11300 Dublin Canyon Road ("Property); <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, the Property is designated Rural Density Residential in the General Plan; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Property is Zoned PUD-RDR/A-OS (Planned Unit Development — Rural <br /> Density Residential/Agriculture and Open Space) District; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a work session on April 14, 2021 regarding <br /> the Project; and then at its regular meeting on July 14, 2021, adopted Resolution PC-2021-12, <br /> recommending the City Council approve the project application; and <br /> WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on August 17, 2021, the City Council received <br /> the recommendation of City staff and the Planning Commission, and the public was given the <br /> opportunity to comment on the Project; and <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING: <br /> Section 1. The City Council does hereby find the proposed project is consistent with the <br /> development density, land uses, development standards and other key parameters established <br /> by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, PUD Development Plan, and General Plan, which were <br /> reviewed pursuant to CEQA in a previously certified and/or adopted environmental document <br /> including the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Pleasanton 2005-2025 General <br /> Plan, certified in July 2009 which was adopted and certified by the City Council in 2009 under City <br /> Council Resolution No. 09-312. In order to provide additional project-level analysis, the applicant <br /> provided an additional Arborist Report/Tree Assessment, Biological Resources Analysis, <br /> Geotechnical Investigation, Noise Assessment Study, and Health Risk Assessment <br /> Memorandum. The assessments identified measures sufficient to reduce project impacts to a <br /> less-than-significant level, and these measures are incorporated as conditions of approval. In <br /> addition, the technical studies identified no new information or changed circumstances that would <br /> require supplemental environmental review, and is consistent with the previously approved EIR <br /> that it is adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this Project and satisfy all the <br /> requirements for CEQA. <br /> Based on the foregoing, the City Council finds pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section <br /> 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning, additional <br /> environmental review is not required because there are no project-specific significant effects <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.