RES 04026 - Laserfiche WebLink

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 04-026 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF REGIS AND LISA LACHANCE, AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-28 WHEREAS, Regis and Lisa Lachance have applied to rezone an approximately 12,400 sq. ft. parcel at ! 072 Division Street from the R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District to the PUD-MDR (Planned Unit Development - Medium Density Residential) Zoning District and for PUD development plan approval to construct two new single-family homes measuring approximately 1,200 sq. ft. and 2,557 sq. ft. on two lots measuring approximately 4,259 sq. ft. and 8,141 sq. ft., respectively; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on May 18, 2004, at which time the public was given the opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the potential impacts in accordance with the applicable state and local guidelines governing the preparation of Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed project would not have any significant adverse effects on the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the proposed project will have no potential for adverse effects on fish and wildlife resources. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approves the Negative Declaration for the application of Regis and Lisa Lachance for rezoning an approximately 12,400 sq. ft. parcel at 1072 Division Street from the R-1- 6,500 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District to the PUD-MDR (Planned Unit Development - Medium Density Residential) Zoning District, and for PUD development plan approval to construct two new singie-family homes measuring approximately 1,200 sq. ft. and 2,557 sq. ft. on two lots measuring approximately 4,259 sq. ft. and 8,141 sq. ft., respectively. Section 2. The City Council finds that the proposed project will have a de minimis impact on fish and wildlife resources.