My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 06152021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 06152021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2021 11:11:55 AM
Creation date
8/19/2021 11:11:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/15/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOTION: It was m/s by Arkin/Testa to adopt Resolution No. 21-1227 approving the two-year <br /> Operating Budget for FY 2021/22 and 2022/23 as amended. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Arkin, Balch, Narum, Testa, Mayor Brown <br /> Noes: None <br /> Abstain: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> 22. Presentation regarding Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Treatment and Wells <br /> Rehabilitation Project Update on Basis of Design Report and authorization to proceed with final <br /> design <br /> Director of Operations and Water Utilities Kathleen Yurchak introduced the item. <br /> Utilities Planning Manager, Todd Yamello explained PFAS are currently being considered for regulation <br /> and advised the State Water Board has issued advisory levels for the three of the compounds. If <br /> concentration levels are found above the notification level the City must notify the governing board and <br /> the State recommends mitigation which usually means taking the water out of service for treatment. He <br /> reported the State is planning to regulate PFOS and PFOA by establishing maximum containment levels <br /> and noted they have a draft regulation identifying the value of those Maximum Contaminant Levels <br /> (MCLS) in the fall of 2022 and will have a final value somewhere in early 2024. Lastly, he advised there <br /> is no indication of an MCL date for PFBS at this time. <br /> He reported the City has three wells, Well 5, Well 6, and Well 8 that provide 20% of the City's water <br /> supply with the remaining 80% coming from Zone 7. He presented an overview of testing that has been <br /> completed since mid-2019. Well 8 is above the response level for PFOS and was taken out of service in <br /> June 2019. All wells are below the response level for PFOA. <br /> The City Council approved a work plan for the long-term treatment of PFAS at Well 5, 6, and 8 on <br /> September 1, 2020. The work plan had two major components with the first being to proceed with a self- <br /> implemented PFAS treatment project at Wells 5, 6, and 8. This allows the City to have control and the <br /> best ability to try to implement the project and meet an MCL target coming in 2024. The secondary effort <br /> was to explore regional solutions on a parallel with Zone 7. The project goals included implementing <br /> PFAS treatment at all wells to `low-treatment" goal, rehabilitating existing well facilities to extend their <br /> useful life 30 years, and providing for treatment expansion. An agreement was approved by the City <br /> Council in September 2020 to prepare a Basis of Design Report(BODR)to define the scope of the project <br /> and serve as a basis for the final design. <br /> Utilities Planning Manager Yamello reported Wells 5, 6, and 8 are on a very good performing aquifer and <br /> can produce water from the aquifer very energy efficiently. Wells 5 and 6 are nearing the end of their <br /> useful life. Well 8 was built in the early 1990s but is not as energy efficient as Wells 5 and 6. <br /> He provided an overview of recommended improvements to rehabilitate all three well facilities. It is <br /> recommended to abandon the existing Well 5 facility as it is reaching the end of its lifecycle. The problem <br /> with replacement is that the site is very constrained and there is not enough room to install a new well <br /> effectively. The well is also below-grade in a vault and any new well casings must be above ground per <br /> State requirements. It is recommended to construct a new Well 9 at Amador Park to replace Well 5. <br /> It is recommended that Well 6 be rehabilitated including replacing the casing, reusing and rehabilitating <br /> the existing building, and replacing mechanical and electrical systems. There would be temporary <br /> impacts to Alisal Elementary School access during construction and would require coordination with <br /> PUSD. The benefit of staying in this location is that it is close to the high-performing aquifer. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 10 June 15. 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.