My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
6
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
08-25
>
6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2021 12:26:18 PM
Creation date
8/18/2021 12:21:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/25/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
6_Exhibits A & B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\08-25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
conducting focused community outreach, including at least one community workshop be held <br /> in October/November to solicit public input on potential sites and the sites analysis, in addition <br /> to the Commission and City Council meetings. <br /> The scoresheet for sites is organized into seven topical sections, discussed in more detail <br /> below. As noted, the proposed scoresheet includes the majority of the criteria from the prior <br /> Housing Element update, with revisions focused on improving clarity and objectivity of criteria, <br /> along with the limited addition of new criteria to reflect changes in state law or other regulatory <br /> programs (such as CEQA). Some selected criteria are proposed to be deleted based on <br /> review and recommendation from the consultant team; an explanation of such changes is also <br /> provided below. <br /> Staff notes that the ultimate sites inventory, as developed through the sites selection process, <br /> may include sites for both lower-income and market-rate housing. State law allows the City to <br /> count units on sites zoned for housing at more than 30 dwelling units per acre (DUA) as low- or <br /> very-low- income for the purposes of the Housing Element inventory. However, it does not <br /> preclude the City from assuming, in the inventory, that such sites will produce market-rate <br /> housing in addition to affordable units. A future policy discussion and decision will entail <br /> determining what affordability levels will be associated with all of the sites in the inventory, <br /> whether they are at a density of 30 DUA or a different density. Nonetheless, because HCD's <br /> review will scrutinize sites assumed to produce lower-income units more closely, and because <br /> higher density sites need to be carefully considered as to how they may integrate into existing <br /> neighborhoods, many of the criteria are focused on evaluating suitability for higher-density <br /> development. <br /> Draft Sites Selection Criteria <br /> The following outlines the draft criteria for the current 6th Cycle Housing Element update within <br /> seven topic areas and highlights key changes to the criteria when compared to scoresheet <br /> from the 4th Cycle update: <br /> Section 1: Site Size and Infill Criteria <br /> The criteria in this section have been updated to incorporate new parameters assigned in state <br /> law for the suitability of sites for higher-density housing (minimum of 0.5 acres and maximum <br /> of 10 acres); to provide a more precise definition of "infill" development that is in alignment with <br /> state law; and to reflect the availability of both wet infrastructure (water and sewer) as well as <br /> dry infrastructure (electricity, telecommunications), which is also a requirement of state law. <br /> Section 2: Proximity to Modes of Transportation <br /> The criteria carry forward parameters included in the prior Housing Element, including <br /> proximity to BART or transit stops with frequent headways; proximity to bicycle facilities, and <br /> convenient freeway access. Note that, at this early stage, it is not possible to assess <br /> intersection-specific traffic impacts from development of particular sites, but this will be <br /> evaluated in parallel with the CEQA review, as part of the consultant scope of work. <br /> Section 3: Proximity to Services and Amenities <br /> The majority of criteria in this section have been carried over from the prior Housing Element; <br /> they reflect both the general planning principle that residential uses should be convenient to <br /> schools, parks, and other amenities, and also respond to criteria in the TCAC program that <br /> Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 8 <br /> discussion regarding massage businesses that arose during the Downtown Specific Plan <br /> (DSP) update, and concerns then about an overabundance of personal services. She <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 July 28, 2021 <br />