My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 06012021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 06012021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2021 11:58:14 AM
Creation date
7/21/2021 11:56:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/1/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson advised other than the <br /> position mentioned earlier, the City has not budgeted for other positions or non-labor to help implement <br /> Senate Bill (SB) 1383 in this budget. City Manager Fialho advised the City has $1 million set aside to <br /> offset SB 1383 costs. He explained some of it was paid years ago by Pleasanton Garbage Service <br /> (PGS) and earmarked for this implementation. He advised it has not yet been allocated and clarified the <br /> $1 million he just mentioned is for start-up costs only and annual operating expenses could be covered <br /> through rate adjustments because it is a new program. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the Low-Income <br /> Housing Fund is funded by developer fees in lieu of building 20% affordable housing. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson reported she does not <br /> expect the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) project to be fully installed in the next two years <br /> which is why this budget does not denote operating costs. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiries, Director of Operations and Water Utilities Yurchak <br /> advised neither voluntary nor mandatory water conservation based on a potential drought were factored <br /> into the estimates. She explained it is in part because the budget was completed before the State and <br /> Zone 7 came out with conservation requests and noted staff will make any appropriate adjustments at <br /> mid-year. She advised if conservation becomes mandatory. staff would come to City Council to discuss <br /> potential drought rates. Director of Finance Olson clarified the increase in Zone 7 costs is partly <br /> because the City will be putting wells out of service for PFAS and buying more water from Zone 7. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the Rainy Day <br /> Fund helps balance the budget. She noted it is an additional reserve not specific to pensions but to be <br /> used for deficits the City will have to recover. City Manager Fialho clarified it is a 10-year forecast <br /> subject to revenue fluctuation and unknown future expenditures. Director of Finance Olson noted every <br /> two years City Council can choose another means of balancing the budget. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson explained the City will debt <br /> finance and possibly also grant finance the PFAS improvements along with rate increases. She advised <br /> those details will be brought to City Council at a later date. She clarified she does not know how SB <br /> 1383 would specifically increase rates. <br /> Councilmember Testa requested an itemized breakdown of how the federal recovery funds have been <br /> and will be used for the follow-up discussion. Director of Finance Olson clarified there is nothing <br /> budgeted in the future beyond the $8.5 million. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the $400,000 in the <br /> General Fund's contingency is for the PPD's new mental health-driven crisis response initiatives. She <br /> advised allocations such as operational expenses, staff expenses, or contractual services will be <br /> determined later. She confirmed it does not initially go to the PPD's operating budget. <br /> Councilmember Arkin echoed Councilmember Testa's call for a breakdown of recovery fund usages for <br /> both her knowledge and public transparency. Director of Finance Olson clarified the $8.5 million is <br /> operating revenue which can be used for General Fund expenses. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the American <br /> Rescue Plan allows a City to pay for General Fund expenses if it can demonstrate lost revenue greater <br /> than or equal to the allocation. She advised the City has been allocated $8.5 million while the federal <br /> methodology reflects $12 million in pandemic-related revenue losses. She explained this allows the City <br /> to use it as a back-filling source for the entire General Fund. She further explained the $8.5 million is <br /> based on the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) formula which looks at population <br /> below-median income and the age of the housing stock. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 10 June 1, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.