PC 052621 - Laserfiche WebLink

Alan Bright, Architect at HOK, discussed the vision for the building and efforts to relate to science and saving energy by the design. He referenced the two and three-story massing of the buildings, metal panels and glass envelopes. He reviewed the various views from different locations on the campus. Steve Van Dorn, Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, provided his support regarding the project and applicant. He highlighted the public outreach from the applicant, the world class architects, design team chosen to design the building and the benefits of the project to the current site. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Nibert mentioned he visited the site and was able to view the construction materials in person. He expressed concern regarding the building materials and wear over time. He discussed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and asked if there were findings of significant impact. Ms. Clark stated there were no significant unavoidable impacts that could not be mitigated. Commissioner Morgan inquired whether all public comments and public outreach from the applicant had been completed and received by the Commission. Mr. Luchini confirmed that Staff had forwarded all public comments received after publication of the agenda packet to the Commission. He discussed the public outreach conducted by the applicant and City. Commissioner Morgan inquired whether there were any emissions found to be of concern, specifically chemical compounds. Mr. Jencek responded that there were no emissions to be released into the environment. He responded that there was ventilation for the HVAC system, but nothing related to emissions. Mr. Hindson responded that 10x Genomics activities performed at their existing facility at Koll Center Parkway were similar to what was intended for the Springdale Avenue site and there were no significant emissions expected from manufacturing of those products. He stated organic compounds were used in very small amounts and there were no hazards. Mr. Hindson confirmed that the emissions produced did not require a permit. Commissioner Pace commended the applicant on their responsiveness. He stated the neighbors, including the mall owner Simon Properties, were in support of the project. He mentioned setbacks and stated his previous concerns around privacy had been addressed. Commissioner Gaidos thanked the applicant and architect for their presentation and noted the applicant answered previous concerns he had regarding the project. He commended the project and indicated support for the development agreement and rezoning. Commissioner Allen commended the applicant for their outreach and time spent answering questions and concerns from neighbors and the Commission. She stated she found the building to be bland due to the use of the gray color and the design being too symmetrical. She suggested: 1) revisiting the color palette to add contrast and create a less industrial feel; 2) modifications to the roof screening material to reduce the "pop appearance"; and 3) reducing uniformity by creating a differentiated treatment around the corners and lower base of buildings, such as stone or masonry work. She requested an inflation increase to the $1 million amenity contribution. Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8 May 26, 2021 d the new trees to be planted to create a lush landscape. He discussed the future parking structure off Stoneridge Mall Road and the benefits of the location. He referenced the queuing details and site circulation plan. He discussed efforts to remain compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 May 26, 2021