Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Ordinance No.2217 <br />Page2 <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES <br />HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION l. The approximately 14.S8-acre site located at 1701 Springdale Avenue is <br />rezoned from the C-R (p) (Regional Commercial - peripheral sites) District to the Planned Unit <br />Development - Commercial-Office ( PU D-C-O) District. <br />SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Pleasanton, dated April 18, 1960, on file with <br />the City Clerk, designating the dividing of the City into zoning districts, is hereby amended by <br />Zoning Unit Map No. 508, attached hereto as Exhibit A, dated June 15,2021, and incorporated <br />herein by this reference. <br />SECTION 3. With respect to the Planned Unit Development application, the City Council <br />makes the following findings and determinations with respect to each of the considerations for <br />approval of a PUD Development Plan as required by Section 18.68.110 of the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code (PMC): <br />Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br />welfare: <br />The City Council finds that the Project is in the best interests of the public health, safety, <br />and general welfare for the following reasons: The Project, as conditioned, meets all <br />applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The Project would <br />include the installation of all required on-site utilities with connections to municipalsystems <br />in order to serve the new development. With the recommended traffic mitigations, the <br />Project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be accommodated by existing City <br />streets and intersections in the area. The structures would be designed to meet the <br />requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. <br />Adequate access would be provided to the structures for police, fire, and other emergency <br />response vehicles. Stormwater run-off from the site will be treated before leaving the site. <br />Construction hour limits and dust suppression requirements would minimize construction <br />impacts on the surrounding residents and tenants. The proposed development is <br />compatible with the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and <br />character of the area. <br />2.Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and any applicable <br />specific plan: <br />The City Council finds the Project is consistent with the City's General Plan for the <br />following reasons: The subject site's Land Use Designation of "Retail/Highway/Service <br />Commercial; Business and Professional Offices" permits office uses. R&D and laboratory <br />uses are not separately defined or identified as a land use category in the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code (PMC); however, both are listed among a broad range of potential uses <br />in the PMC's definition of "Light lndustrial." R&D and laboratory uses are not expressly <br />permitted in the C-R (p) District; thus, the Project would be consistent with the General <br />Plan Land Use Designation if the subject site is rezoned to PUD. The proposed 381,000 <br />sq. ft of building area would result in a floor area ratio (FAR) of 60% for the subject site. <br />This complies with the 60% maximum FAR permitted for the designated land use, subject <br />to the project providing sufficient amenities and mitigations to offset its impacts. With the <br />rezoning, the Development Agreement would be consistent with the General Plan and <br />also deliver additional amenities and benefits to the City, and the project environmental <br />review determined that all project impacts would be adequately mitigated. The proposed