|
Resolution No. PC-2021-11
<br /> Page Two
<br /> identified measures sufficient to reduce project impacts to a less-than-significant level,
<br /> and these measures are incorporated as conditions of approval. In addition, the
<br /> technical studies identified no new information or changed circumstances that would
<br /> require supplemental environmental review, is consistent with the previously approved
<br /> EIR, is adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this Project and
<br /> satisfy all the requirements of the CEQA.
<br /> Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission finds that pursuant to CEQA
<br /> Guidelines Section 15183, projects consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or
<br /> Zoning, additional environmental review is not required because there are no project-
<br /> specific significant effects peculiar to the project or its site that would result from the
<br /> proposed project. Accordingly, no changes to mitigation measures, findings, or
<br /> statement of overriding considerations are needed.
<br /> Section 2: Findings for PUD-114-01M
<br /> With respect to the Planned Unit Development application, PUD-114-01M, the Planning
<br /> Commission makes the following findings and determinations with respect to each of
<br /> the considerations for approval of a PUD Development Plan as required by Section
<br /> 18.68.110 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC):
<br /> 1. Whether the proposed development plan is in the best interest of the
<br /> public health, safety, and general welfare.
<br /> The Planning Commission finds that the proposed project, as conditioned,
<br /> meets all applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and
<br /> welfare. The subject development would include the installation of all required
<br /> on-site utilities, with connections to municipal systems in order to serve the
<br /> new lots. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be
<br /> accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The
<br /> structures would be designed to meet the requirements of the California
<br /> Building Code, California Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. The
<br /> proposed development is compatible with the adjacent uses and would be
<br /> generally consistent with the existing scale of development and rural
<br /> character of the area. Adequate setbacks would be provided between the
<br /> new church and adjacent properties, including Dublin Creek. Planning
<br /> Commission finds the proposed PUD development plan is in the best
<br /> interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare, and that this finding
<br /> can be made. As such, the Commission concludes this finding can be made.
<br /> 2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the
<br /> Pleasanton General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
<br /> The proposed development includes the construction of a new religious
<br /> facility on an approximately 4.3-acre portion of the 16-acre site. Religious
<br /> facilities are Conditionally Permitted in residential zones and therefore
<br /> conforms to the General Plan Rural Density Residential land use designation,
<br /> with the remaining agricultural parcel with Open Space. The proposed project
<br /> would promote General Plan Programs and Policies to maintain a complete
<br />dia.
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 May 12, 2021
<br />e requirements and how does the 6th RHNA Cycle compare to the cities of Livermore and
<br /> Dublin. Ms. Clark stated she had not looked at that data point but could bring back the
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 May 12, 2021
<br /> of 16
<br /> Page 5 of 16
<br /><br /> , ..'itiovvittcl.,d--:_-_-:_--- ---.1, --,.,,c-v-,,t, ._,A g
<br /> -,1
<br /> 1--J
<br /> It WAYCROSSCRISFIELD .*- 4-; -,47÷-'' 1.1--1 ''.-. HAM
<br /> ;-----fk;s7,4G
<br /> il
<br /> 3`
<br /> • kst • .7
<br /> I DIJNIYA1:1%, ..4.. ,i4is' '1 , „J 10 ,,,...
<br /> ‘1 'kTIAV - 1) \ ‘ ' ?) $.Y \t, ,2:2/
<br /> \ ‘ 111-,-,: .
<br /> ,..... i ..., i
<br /> 1:11,343
<br /> o 0.125 0.25 mi PUD-140, Townsend, Lot Line, 2207 Martin Ave Planning Division =-- -.• .-.... , 1:16
<br /> I i II May 10,2021 FLEA:.,ANTON.
<br /> 0 650 1,300 Feet
<br />
|