Laserfiche WebLink
Dennis Drive <br /> A condition of approval for the adjacent PUD-97 (3520 Dennis Drive and 2201 Martin Avenue) <br /> required the property owner to dedicate to the City sufficient area to widen Dennis Drive in <br /> front of 3520 Dennis Drive to include a 28-foot-wide street with a five-foot wide monolithic <br /> sidewalk. Although the property owner dedicated the land and deposited funds to allow the <br /> widening in the future, the Dennis Drive frontage was not fully widened when its parcel map <br /> was processed by the City in 2006. <br /> Similarly, the property owner for the applications being considered will be required to dedicate <br /> area for widening Dennis Drive along the property frontage, and to either implement the <br /> widening on the City's behalf or provide sufficient financial security to assure completion when <br /> the City constructs the widening project at some unspecified time in the future. Prior to <br /> commencement of the street widening, City Engineering Department staff will coordinate with <br /> the property owner of 3520 Dennis Drive. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Consistency with General Plan and Zoning Land Uses: <br /> General Plan <br /> The density of any individual parcel must fall within the allowable density range for the General <br /> Plan land use designation. The subject property has a General Plan Land Use Designation of <br /> Low Density Residential (LDR), which allows a maximum density of less than two dwelling <br /> units per gross acre (translating to a density of 1.999...dwelling units per acre) with a mid-point <br /> density of one dwelling unit per gross-acre. The proposal, for two units would reflect an <br /> equivalent density of 1.2 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the low-density <br /> designation. <br /> The proposed density is above the mid-point density of 1 du/ac and would typically require a <br /> public amenity with development, per the General Plan. Examples of amenities include the <br /> provision of affordable housing, and dedication and/or improvement of parkland, open space, <br /> and/or trails beyond the standard requirements. However, at its public hearing on the <br /> prezoning (Ordinance No. 1709 for RZ-97-2) the City Council supported staff and Planning <br /> Commission recommendations of a density of a density "approaching two dwelling units per <br /> acre, i.e. 1 .999...du/acre" for the entire areas subject to annexation, including this site. The <br /> Planning Commission agenda report also discussed the provision of amenities, recognizing <br /> this would be above the mid-point density. The Planning Commission and City Council <br /> concurred with staff's recommendation, at the time, that no additional amenities or benefits <br /> needed to be provided in conjunction with the density conferred, based on the following <br /> factors: <br /> 1. The average density of the area surrounding the prezoning project area is 2 du/ac. <br /> 2. The difference between 2 du/ac versus 1 du/ac would be approximately 33 more <br /> dwellings across the entire area. Although a substantial difference, available land <br /> designated for LDR land uses which, when averaged with these sites, would achieve <br /> the 1 du/ac Citywide average for this land use designation; and <br /> 3. Parkland, open space, and trails were already in place and available in the area to <br /> offset the greater number of units. These facilities included the five-acre neighborhood <br /> park at the end of Martin Avenue and the 150-foot-wide buffer area located between <br /> Martin Avenue and the gravel quarry. Furthermore, the analysis concluded that <br /> PUD-140 & P21-0079, 2207 Martin Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 10 <br />g Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />k to that level of detail for the circulation, but <br /> staff would work with Simon Properties to ensure they were appropriately located in the <br /> design. Commissioner Pace asked if the driveway finalizations would come back before the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />