Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist and City of Pleasanton–10x Genomics Project <br />Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> <br /> <br />58 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480024/ISMND/wp/21480024 10x Genomics Project Full Screencheck ISMND.docx <br />Northwest Information Center <br />A records search and literature review were conducted on January 13, 2021, at the NWIC, located at <br />Sonoma State University at Rohnert Park, for the project site and a 0.5-mile radius surrounding it. <br />The purpose of this review was to access existing cultural resource survey reports, archaeological <br />site records, historic aerial photographs, and historic maps and evaluate whether any previously <br />documented prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, cultural landscapes, <br />or other resources exist within or near the project site. <br />The results of the records search indicate that one historic-era resource (P-01-011808) has been <br />recorded within the 0.5-mile search radius, however, no resources were recorded within the project <br />boundary. In addition, 24 area-specific survey reports are on file with the NWIC for the project site <br />and its 0.5-mile search radius. Reports S-32780 and S-47534 address portions of the project site, <br />indicating that it has previously been surveyed for cultural resources. A records search map <br />identifying the project boundaries and a 0.5-mile search radius along with relevant non-confidential <br />records search results can be found in Appendix C-1. <br />Pedestrian Survey/Architectural and Historic Resources Assessment <br />On February 5, 2021, FCS Senior Archaeologist, Dana Douglas DePietro, PhD, conducted a pedestrian <br />survey for unrecorded cultural resources within the fully-developed shopping center situated at the <br />project site, which consisted at the time of the site visit of approximately 10 connected retail <br />buildings, associated parking lots and infrastructure, and landscaping elements.34 <br />The survey began in the southwest portion of the project site at the corner of Springdale Avenue and <br />Stoneridge Drive and moved clockwise around the project site. Given that the project site is almost <br />entirely hardscaped, standard transects spaced at approximately 5-meter intervals were replaced <br />with a direct focus on the build environment and observable soils in landscaping elements that <br />surround the site. Visibility of soils in these areas was moderate (30-50 percent) and consisted of <br />medium brown loam interspersed with gravel and small stones (3-5 centimeters) composed of schist <br />and quartz. It appears these soils are highly disturbed and may have been imported from off-site. <br />Survey conditions were documented using digital photographs and field notes. During the survey, Dr. <br />DePietro examined all areas of the exposed ground surface for prehistoric artifacts (e.g., fire-affected <br />rock, milling tools, flaked stone tools, tool-making debris, ceramics), soil discoloration and <br />depressions that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, faunal and human osteological <br />remains, and features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., postholes, <br />standing exterior walls, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., glass, metal, ceramics). At no point were <br />any historic or prehistoric cultural resources observed within the project site. Survey photographs <br />may be found in Appendix C.2. <br /> <br />34 Since the time of the pedestrian survey, the City issued a permit for demolition of all existing buildings. Demolition of the buildings <br />occurred in Spring 2021. All buildings and structures were determined to have been built between the years 1979 and 1982, making <br />them less than 45 years in age. Properties less than 45 years in age are typically ineligible for the NRHP, CRHR, or at the local level, <br />and thus do not constitute potential historic resources under CEQA.