Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br /> The administration of a workers' compensation program is complex due to numerous <br /> legal mandates and other requirements for processing claims. The consequences of <br /> errors are the imposition of penalties on employers, increased financial responsibility <br /> and poor employer-employee relations. Thus, smaller, and midsize cities typically use <br /> the services of a qualified third-party administrator that employs experienced and <br /> certified staff to manage their workers' compensation challenges and compliance <br /> requirements. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Per the City's Purchasing Policy, after a professional services agreement has reached <br /> five years, the City must issue a request for proposals. The City issued a request for <br /> proposals for vendors to provide the services of a third-party administrator to help <br /> manage the City's workers' compensation program, beginning July 1, 2021. <br /> Six vendors submitted proposals. The City's review committee evaluated all responses <br /> to the RFP. Based on its evaluation, the City's review committee invited three vendors <br /> (LWP Claims Solutions, Acclamation Insurance Management Services, and ICS) to <br /> provide a 15-minute presentation and participate in a 30-minute question and answer <br /> session with the City's review committee. The City's review committee considered the <br /> following criteria when evaluating the proposals, presentation, and question and answer <br /> session: demonstrated experience in the workers' compensation and risk management <br /> field; demonstrated relationships with medical providers; innovative approach to <br /> reducing claims; demonstrated competent, knowledgeable and sufficient staffing levels; <br /> familiarity with the City and its Council goals, priorities, etc.; prior experience with the <br /> City and/or similar cities workers' compensation third-party administrator; quality and <br /> thoroughness of the proposal, quality and thoroughness of the interview; references; <br /> and cost. Based on the vendors' presentations and responses during the question and <br /> answer session, the review committee found that ICS best matched the selection <br /> criteria and awarded the contract to ICS. <br /> In conclusion, staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with <br /> ICS for three years, with the option to renew for two successive one-year terms. <br /> Renewals will be mutually agreed upon by both parties. <br /> Submitted by: Reviewed by: Approved by: <br /> " <br /> it-11/ <br /> Debra Gill Tina Olson Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Human Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Resources and Labor <br /> Relations <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />