My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
060121
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2021 9:20:08 AM
Creation date
5/26/2021 9:19:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/1/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Notice of the determination of the director of community development shall be <br /> provided to the Planning Commission, and any appeal of the decision shall be <br /> referred to the Planning Commission in accordance with the provisions of <br /> Chapter 18.44 of the PMC. In cases where an exception to the active ground <br /> floor use requirement is granted, the provisions of Chapter 18.120 of the PMC <br /> with respect to non-conforming uses shall not apply, and a new tenant shall be <br /> required to conform to the Active Ground Floor Use Overlay, unless another <br /> exception is granted by the director of community development based on the <br /> above criteria." <br /> Modifications to Draft Policies During DSP Review Process <br /> Although the policies related to the AGFUO cited above are the adopted versions, the <br /> policies were reviewed and revised throughout the DSP update process. There was <br /> considerable discussion among the Task Force and other stakeholders on the pros and <br /> cons of these policies, which ultimately sought to strike a balance between preserving <br /> ground floor spaces along Main Street for active uses, while providing some limited <br /> exceptions intended to avoid undue hardship to property owners. These included <br /> exceptions for tenant spaces subject to an extended vacancy of these spaces; to <br /> accommodate unique situations (such as multi-tenant or multi-uses within a single <br /> building or space); and to account for some specific challenges for certain Main Street <br /> properties, such as leasing purpose-built bank buildings for other uses. Attachment 2 to <br /> this report summarizes the comments and revisions related to AGFUO policies from the <br /> DSP Task Force, City Council, Commissions and Committees, and the public. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Although the City Council's request to discuss the active ground floor use policy was <br /> based on a requested exception for a mixed-occupancy use, this meeting provides an <br /> opportunity for discussion of all aspects of the active ground floor use policy. <br /> Exception for Spaces Containing Multiple (Active and Non-Active) Uses <br /> As previously noted, the Planning Commission recently deliberated on an appeal of the <br /> Director of Community Development's denial of an exception to the active ground floor <br /> use requirement. The Planning Commission meeting agenda report, public comments, <br /> and excerpted minutes are included as Attachments 3, 4 and 5, respectively. <br /> Planning Commission Discussion and Comments <br /> Subsequent to the Director of Community Development's determination regarding the <br /> exception and related appeal, the appellant had modified her business plan to meet the <br /> "25 percent" requirement identified in DSP Policy LU-P.18. However, although the <br /> revised business plan and updated floor plan were determined to meet the literal <br /> requirements of the policy, the Planning Commission had an extensive discussion <br /> regarding whether the policy as written would ensure the broader intent of the active <br /> ground floor use policy and DSP would be met. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.