3_Exhibits E-G - Laserfiche WebLink

4. Is the site plan, circulation, phasing approach and parking ratio acceptable? Commissioner Allen stated she would like to wait for Mr. Tassano's analysis on traffic circulation, but that she liked that it was coming from Springdale Avenue. She also expressed concern about the drop off on the Stoneridge Mall side. Commissioner O'Connor indicated support for the proposal but expressed similar concerns as Commissioner Allen regarding access from Springdale Avenue and echoed his desire to see the traffic analysis. Commissioners Brown and Pace expressed agreement with Commissioners Allen and O'Connor. Chair Ritter also stated his agreement and mentioned the environmental evaluation of the traffic flow and how it tied into the parking ratio and circulation was always a concern. He also stated he liked the phased approached to the project. Discussion Point #4: 5. Is there additional information needed to assist the Commission in its decision on the proposed project? Chair Ritter requested that the matters raised by both public comments received during the meeting be considered. Commissioner Allen summarized the information requested so far, including an economic analysis for City Council on land use changes, an environmental evaluation around biological issues, traffic study, streetscape, consideration of four-story buildings and setback requirements over time, and building Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards. She mentioned the Workday LEED platinum building and suggested the project aim towards carbon neutrality. Commissioner Brown commented on the concerns raised by Ms. Kohn during public comment about the lighting and requested limited LED lighting overflow. Commissioner Pace discussed challenges of power generation in the State and suggested the use of solar to reduce power grid demands. Chair Ritter concurred with the comments by the other commissioners. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION 6. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) Commissioner O'Connor discussed the Heritage Tree Board of Appeals meeting where it was decided to remove ten eucalyptus trees at the request of the fire department. Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 November 18, 2020 fication if necessary. Commissioner Allen agreed with the suggestion. Commissioner Brown stated he liked the detail in Building 1 with the courtyard and that it mirrored the proposed residential reviewed for the mall development. He stated he liked the revision and suggested it might be better to have three- and four-story buildings but he liked the height. Chair Ritter stated he liked that the design removed the dumpsters currently at the entrance to the Stoneridge Mall area. He suggested waiting to determine setbacks until there were details on building height and location on the lot, adding that community benefit was more important to him. He suggested Building 1 be taller than Buildings 2 and 3 because it was further back and would give the campus more of a park feel. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8 November 18, 2020 with the City. Commissioner Allen asked if the company was planning on keeping all three locations in the City or if they would consolidate after the opening of the proposed campus. Mr. Jencek stated the idea was new net growth. Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 November 18, 2020 Approvals or that could prevent or 4412928_2 -10- the Project, which list shall include the following items: 4412928_2 -8-