My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032421
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC 032421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2021 3:51:16 PM
Creation date
5/18/2021 3:51:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/24/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
setbacks, restaurant, cabana, and outdoor spaces for events. She reminded the Commission <br /> and staff of creative public notification in order to increase public participation. She requested <br /> signage at the project announcing the next meeting and how the public could provide <br /> comments. <br /> Chair Brown requested a tree analysis. He asked if the Planning Commission could restrict the <br /> Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in terms of residents or tenants. Ms. Clark stated there were <br /> limitations on ADUs being used as transient rental purposes, or nightly rentals. She stated the <br /> PUD could not restrict long term rental of the ADU. Chair Brown stated the property was <br /> unique and passionately cared about by the community, in part due to the Barone's success. <br /> He asked if there was additional opportunity for public input. Ms. Clark stated the public could <br /> continue to send comments and suggestions to staff. <br /> Commissioner Allen suggested the developers conduct meetings with the public to obtain <br /> public support, sharing various designs to come up with what they thought was a winning <br /> proposal for them and for the public, a win-win that benefitted the community and developer <br /> and property owner, leading to an even more productive workshop. <br /> 7. PUD-114-01M, Guy Houston for Resurrection Greek Orthodox Church, 11300 Dublin <br /> Canyon Road — Work Session to discuss an application for Planned Unit Development <br /> (PUD) Major Modification to PUD-114, to include a Minor Subdivision and Conditional Use <br /> Permit (CUP) to construct and operate a 24,971-square-foot church and community center <br /> at 11300 Dublin Canyon Road. Zoning is A (Agriculture) District. <br /> As noted on the agenda, this item was continued to the next Planning Commission meeting on <br /> April 14, 2021 . <br /> MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION <br /> 8. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> Commissioner Pace reported on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Committee Meeting. <br /> 9. Actions of the City Council <br /> Community Development Director Ellen Clark gave a brief overview of items listed in the <br /> report. <br /> 10.Future Planning Calendar <br /> Ms. Denis gave a brief overview of future items for the Commission's review. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> All Commissioners thanked Commissioner O'Connor for his service on the Planning <br /> Commission. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 12 March 24, 2021 <br />int <br /> to promote lower costs and a more stable venue. He stated two story building massing was <br /> appropriate and three story could be fine since it was a transitional space. He stated he would <br /> hold judgment until he saw a plan that met the intent of the DSP and Council direction. <br /> Discussion Point #4: Other Information <br /> A) Is there additional information needed to assist the Commission in its decision on <br /> the proposal? <br /> Commissioner Pace asked if the applicant had asked if the City was interested in purchasing <br /> the space, or at least part of it for City purposes. Ms. Clark stated it was not a conversation <br /> that had been had with the applicant or property owner. <br /> Commissioner Allen requested a tree analysis and total square footage currently used for <br /> retail. Ms. Clark asked if she wanted to know the total size of the property, the building, plus all <br /> outdoor areas. Commissioner Allen clarified that she wanted the square footage on the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 12 March 24, 2021 <br />e's Blacksmith Square. He referenced the City of San Jose's <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 12 March 24, 2021 <br />Chair Brown confirmed that <br /> the discussion about the ground floor use would be restricted to the restaurant portion of the <br /> property. Ms. Clark clarified the active ground floor requirement of the DSP applies to <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 12 March 24, 2021 <br />