My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
GHAD
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
051821
>
GHAD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2021 3:39:50 PM
Creation date
5/12/2021 3:39:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/18/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
significant event occur, this reserve amount is likely inadequate to cover the cost of <br /> needed repairs. <br /> As noted above, the proposed assessments fund geologic monitoring and related <br /> maintenance services, which provide: (1) all lands included within a district shall be <br /> specially benefitted by construction proposed in a plan of control approved by the <br /> legislative body and (2) the assessments were previously approved by all property <br /> owners at the time the assessment was created. Since these criteria have been <br /> satisfied, the GHAD assessments can be increased by an amount not exceeding the <br /> ENR index without being subject to a Proposition 218 vote of current property owners. <br /> Public Comment <br /> In prior years, staff held informational meetings with property owners from the four <br /> GHADs. The following are some of the issues addressed at those meetings: <br /> a) Residents were concerned whether their assessments were going to <br /> increase. In previous years, staff was able to advise those residents that the <br /> index for the GHADs provided for no change in the assessment from the <br /> previous year. For the past few years, however, a nominal two percent <br /> increase was recommended which is less than or equal to the ENR index. <br /> b) Residents from the Laurel Creek GHAD commented about the amount of <br /> reserves in their GHAD and wanted to know if there was a cap for the <br /> reserves. Staff explained the Plan of Control for the CHAD anticipates a <br /> major event every 10 years. Since the Laurel Creek CHAD is over 10 years <br /> old and there has not been an event, the reserves have continued to grow. <br /> Staff explained that reserves are like an insurance policy: if a landslide <br /> occurred, funds from the reserves could be immediately available to repair the <br /> landslide. If there were not sufficient funds in the reserves to repair the slide, <br /> some other method of payment for the repairs would be necessary such as <br /> borrowing money or selling municipal bonds. In either case, the property <br /> owners within the CHAD would be responsible for these costs. The City's <br /> geotechnical consultant has stated the cost of repairing a small landslide <br /> could cost over $300,000 and that a large landslide could cost over <br /> $1,000,000. Based on these numbers, staff and the City's consultant have <br /> determined that there are insufficient reserves in the Laurel Creek CHAD. In <br /> several years when the reserves grow larger, the City's consultant can update <br /> the current risk assessment based upon history of the CHAD and recalculate <br /> the probability of a major event and cost. <br /> c) Residents asked why the reserves were not earning a higher rate of return, <br /> which could then offset the amount of the assessments. Staff explained that <br /> the investment vehicles available to public entities are limited and <br /> conservative, so a high rate of return should not be expected. <br /> d) Residents of The Preserve sought an explanation of the prior annexation of <br /> Kolb Ranch and Oak Hill Estates to the Laurel Creek GHAD due to concerns <br /> Page 5of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.