My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 03162021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 03162021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2021 10:09:48 AM
Creation date
5/6/2021 10:07:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Testa expressed her belief that staff in conjunction with community input will be <br /> successful in certifying a Housing Element with sites identified for the 6,000 units, in all identified <br /> categories and believes it can be accomplished without consultants. She explained the difference with <br /> this cycle is there are production mandates with consequences in addition to merely rezoning. She <br /> noted the City has already built 200% of its above-moderate units in the current cycle but just a fraction <br /> of the other units. She advised most the City's affordable housing is inclusionary. She further explained <br /> the City would have to build an unreasonable 13,790 overall units to meet the affordable housing goals <br /> in the current 20% inclusionary system. <br /> Councilmember Testa reported the building industry has advised they cannot build all the housing <br /> needed to meet the state mandates. She ran through a variety of scenarios for building a variety of <br /> units where the numbers do not compute and added the City would need $1.5 billion in funding to make <br /> up the difference. She advised some of that sum would come through tax credits and grants but <br /> stressed the City should be investigating working with non-profit builders on projects with 50% or even <br /> up to 100% affordable units. <br /> Councilmember Testa noted the staff report recommends looking at every possible avenue to bring the <br /> numbers back to the State and advised the State is putting the City in an unachievable position with <br /> unfunded mandates. She believes the crisis is in affordable housing and not market-rate housing citing <br /> construction figures from the last cycle skewed dramatically towards market-rate. She emphasized the <br /> need is to focus on affordability but noted it will be a tough process. - <br /> Councilmember Arkin expressed support for advocating for the reevaluation of RHNA numbers <br /> especially considering companies going to permanent work-at-home due to the pandemic. She <br /> expressed support for more affordable housing noting the City has not done its part in the current cycle. <br /> She agreed with Councilmember Testa's grim assessment of the financial component noting the $15 <br /> million in the Affordable Housing Fund will not go far. She advised there are advocacy efforts towards <br /> having the State help with funding. She expressed concerns for adverse effects to infrastructure and <br /> the City's high-quality school system which attracts new residents. <br /> Councilmember Balch expressed confidence the Council can provide the required leadership and <br /> expressed support for appealing the RHNA numbers. He noted the process established by staff will <br /> allow for adjustments in the numbers as they progress. <br /> Councilmember Balch advised that during his time on the Planning Commission they focused on no net <br /> loss zoning. He explained the concept is if they approve 30 units per acre and the building only allows <br /> for 20 the remaining 10 need to be found somewhere else. He believes the City needs to start planning <br /> now to preserve the character of the community while adapting to the forthcoming RHNA challenges <br /> and noted it will take time to distill. He stressed the need for community input, outreach, and education <br /> to find the best results. <br /> Mayor Brown expressed support for the intended outreach and expressed agreement with <br /> Councilmember Narum in the need to spread this all over town for the benefit of PUSD, traffic, and the <br /> burden of development not being limited to one side of town. She pledged to have the numbers <br /> rechecked and reiterated a desire for local control for knowing the nuances and resources of their <br /> community so well. She advised there will be significant public outreach and noted this will require <br /> substantial collaboration. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Testa to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an <br /> agreement with Lisa Wise Consulting in the amount of $302,001 for the preparation of City of <br /> Pleasanton's 2023-2031 Housing Element; and an agreement with First Carbon Solutions in the <br /> amount of $343,170 for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Environmental Impact Report the item. Motion <br /> passed by the following vote: <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 15 March 16. 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.