Laserfiche WebLink
• Zoning "Buffer": It may also be beneficial for the Sites Inventory to include a "buffer," <br /> similar to or larger than that included in the 2015 Housing Element, to account for the <br /> fact that not all sites may remain viable throughout the Housing Element period, and thus <br /> providing some flexibility in meeting RHNA goals and no net loss requirements. (This <br /> strategy could also help to address the "No Net Loss" issue as well, instead of or in <br /> addition to the secondary list of sites discussed above). <br /> • Density and Site Development Assumptions: The 2015 Housing Element took the <br /> general approach that lower-income units would be accommodated on higher-density <br /> sites (e.g. as apartments and condominiums) and that moderate and above-moderate <br /> income units would be accommodated on low- and medium density sites (e.g. as <br /> detached and attached single-family units like townhomes). In this cycle, and particularly <br /> given the likely need to identify sites for moderate- and above-moderate housing, the <br /> Housing Element could consider alternative approaches, such as allocating a share of <br /> the moderate- and above-moderate need to higher density sites and in multi-family <br /> developments.10 <br /> • Distribution of Sites and Units: In the current and prior Housing Element, a policy <br /> guideline for selection of sites was to try and distribute sites, particularly higher density <br /> sites, throughout the community. In recent discussions with City Council regarding the <br /> Housing Element, there remains a commitment to this approach, to avoid <br /> overconcentrating larger projects and potential impacts within only certain parts of the <br /> city. <br /> • Promoting Affordability: As discussed, while market-rate housing has been built at levels <br /> over and above the RHNA targets, it has been much more challenging to produce below- <br /> market-rate (BMR) and affordable housing. The Housing Element process will need to <br /> consider creative strategies to encourage more affordable housing production, looking at <br /> partnerships, regulatory changes, and zoning strategies that could yield a higher <br /> proportion of BMR units as a percentage of total housing production. A consideration <br /> here will be feasibility and ensuring that such strategies could not be interpreted by HCD <br /> as unduly constraining overall housing production. <br /> NEXT STEPS <br /> After conclusion of this initial kick-off meeting with the Planning Commission and kick-off <br /> meetings with the Housing Commission and City Council, staff and LWC will start work on <br /> organizing and scheduling the first community meeting and initial stakeholder meetings in early <br /> summer. Information gained at these initial meetings will help frame the future goals and <br /> policies discussion for the Housing Element and provide insight from local service providers <br /> and housing developers into the challenges and hurdles for providing Pleasanton's fair share <br /> of housing. In addition, the community meetings will help provide insight from the community <br /> about what types of housing programs and assistance is needed and how to best serve the <br /> 0 Note that legislation recently approved(AB 725 (Wicks))and will require a portion of moderate-and above-moderate <br /> RHNA to be accommodated on multi-family sites. <br /> Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br /> 12 of 13 <br />