Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Balch reported rates are trending down and expressed his desire to see his child go <br /> back to school, park users respect each other, and downtown reopen. He agrees with mask efficacy but <br /> is challenged by how to get the City to zero cases in regards to governmental reach. <br /> Councilmember Narum noted numbers are consistently lower than Dublin's and Livermore's despite not <br /> having an ordinance; and is not convinced it is a deterrent. She noted that wearing a mask is part of a <br /> daily routine for most people and an ordinance will not convince others to start wearing one. She <br /> explained she is not ready to have PPD answer calls to get people to wear a mask. She explained the <br /> impression of downtown could be impacted by the time of your visit noting she and her husband had <br /> lunch there surrounded by masked residents on Sunday afternoon. She expressed her support for <br /> continued education and additional less-wordy signage. <br /> Councilmember Testa seconded the motion and noted the Council has been asked for the past year to <br /> stand up for residents who do not feel safe. She advised people do not support downtown restaurants <br /> because they do not feel safe for lack of masks. She reported she has observed the mask-wearing <br /> percentages decline as it gets later at night. She advised an ordinance is a tool for calls the PPD <br /> already receives to use if needed. She would like to answer the call from community members who ask <br /> the Council to help keep their families safe and will support the motion. <br /> Mayor Brown said she is not ready to put a fine and penalty behind mask-wearing and would rather <br /> support education that works based upon the data. She noted she would rather see officers have <br /> masks available in a positive manner instead of a punitive one because the threat does not always <br /> work. She congratulated business owners for their efforts to ensure customers are following the rules. <br /> City Manager Fialho clarified the Council could direct staff to rethink messaging and methods of <br /> communications and return with a different plan. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Arkin/Testa to adopt an ordinance imposing fines for not complying with <br /> Alameda County's facemask mandates City-wide. Motion failed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Arkin, Testa <br /> Noes: Councilmembers Balch, Narum, Mayor Brown <br /> Absent: None <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Balch/Narum to direct staff to enhance education and signage about mask- <br /> wearing and have Pleasanton Police Department officers assist in mask distribution. Motion passed by <br /> the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Arkin, Balch, Narum, Mayor Brown <br /> Noes: Councilmember Testa <br /> Absent: None <br /> City Attorney Sodergren noted it is after 11:00 p.m. and the Council needs to consider whether it wants <br /> to hear the remaining Agenda Items. <br /> Councilmember Narum requested continuing both items. <br /> Councilmember Testa requested to hear both items noting Item No. 19 should be quick. <br /> Mayor Brown expressed concerns regarding the time needed to hear both items, noting there is a staff <br /> report with Item No. 20. <br /> Councilmember Arkin expressed her desire to hear Item No. 19 and continue Item No. 20. <br /> Councilmember Testa and Councilmembers Narum and Balch agreed. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 14 of 16 February 16, 2021 <br />