Laserfiche WebLink
treatment makes the purified water safe, but the City would still maintain safeguards. He <br /> confirmed there is potential for catastrophe if it got into the aquifer. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Director Yurchak stated she did not include the public <br /> support for Measure J in the staff report because the focus was on the Council's priority and the <br /> studies. She added they are not at the point of moving forward with the Potable Reuse Project but <br /> merely studying it. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, City Manager Fialho expressed his opinion that the <br /> question of whether the discovery of PFAS should change priorities is one for the Council to <br /> consider and not staff. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiries, Director Yurchak confirmed Pleasanton is Zone 7's <br /> largest water reseller and that the studies account for an ongoing decrease in wastewater due to <br /> home technology advances like high efficiency washing machines. She they receive complaints <br /> from residents about the water quality and inquire with Zone 7 about them. She also confirmed it <br /> can vary depending on the time of year and the seasonal water source. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Director Yurchak could not immediately provide the cost of <br /> a potable reuse system and its various options. Mayor Brown stated a 2018 staff report estimated <br /> the cost at $222 million. Director of Operations and Water Utilities Yurchak stated potable reuse <br /> came in as between $2,200-2,500 per acre-foot. Mayor Brown commented the current cost is <br /> $640 per acre-foot and the California Water Fix is $740. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director Yurchak confirmed this Item is about <br /> continuing the $300,000 study and not purchasing a $222 million system. She also confirmed they <br /> are not making decisions today on future costs associated with potable reuse. <br /> Mayor Brown opened public comment. <br /> Angela Ramirez Holmes stated she joined the Zone 7 Board of Directors to help foster <br /> relationships with retailers like her hometown of Pleasanton which has led savings to customers <br /> through collaboration between retailers. She stated that while she is unsure about potable reuse <br /> there is a due diligence responsibility to research this requested local option. She noted the <br /> Council unanimously approved considering this research in 2018 and asked the Council to follow <br /> through on its commitment and good faith negotiation alongside its regional partners to study this <br /> locally controlled option. <br /> Olivia Sanwong concurred with Ms. Ramirez and noted she ran for the Zone 7 board because she <br /> believes in collective partnerships for the region's good and shared groundwater basin. She <br /> stated Zone 7 has the authority to proceed without Pleasanton but would rather do so with her <br /> hometown's input. She stated she has no opinion yet on potable reuse but urged the City to <br /> continue to be part of the conversation once the study is completed. She added there have been <br /> multiple droughts since the General Plan was written and with more forecasted the potable reuse <br /> option should be considered. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Ms. Sanwong clarified her recent "no" vote on Zone 7's <br /> Delta Conveyance Project by stating it was to allow more time to assess the differences between <br /> former Governor Brown's twin-tunnel proposal and current Governor Newsom's single-tunnel <br /> proposal, and to provide more time for the community to be heard. <br /> Matt Maciel expressed his hesitancy as a resident about using potable reuse water and <br /> encouraged the Council to spend the money elsewhere. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 12 February 2, 2021 <br />