13A ATTACHMENTS 1-2 - Laserfiche WebLink

ATTACHMENT 2 DRAFT 2021 Recommended Positions on Bills Assembly Bill/ Summary Guiding Recommended City Position TVC League of Senate Bill Principle Position CA Cities Position AB 59 (Gabriel) This bill would increase, for fees and Housing Watch. The bill would extend None Watch Mitigation Fee service charges and for fees for noticing timeframes, which, Act: fees: notice specified public facilities, the time for though affording interested parties and timelines mailing the notice of the time and more time for review, may cause place of the meeting to at least 45 delays in the City's ability to adopt days before the meeting. new fees and charges in a timely manner. However, a "watch" position is recommended to determine the potential impact to the City. AB 115 (Bloom) Would, notwithstanding any Housing Oppose with comment letter None Watch Planning and inconsistent provision of a city's or addressing the following issues: zoning: county's general plan, specific plan, commercial zoning ordinance, or regulation, Loss of the City's discretion to zoning: housing would require that a housing determine appropriate locations development development be an authorized use for housing, resulting in potential on a site designated in any local agency's zoning code or maps for land use incompatibilities commercial uses if certain conditions apply. Among these conditions, the Reduction of the City's inventory bill would require that the housing of sites available to accommodate development be subject to a commercial uses to accommodate recorded deed restriction requiring sales-tax and employment that at least 20% of the units have an generating uses, and provide affordable housing cost or affordable convenient services for residents rent for lower income households, as those terms are defined, and located on a site that satisfies specified Insufficient requirement for criteria. affordable, versus market-rate housing. DRAFT RAFT behruary 5,2021